Humeral axial rotation measurement through a proximal ulna marker cluster

Accurate measurement of internal/external rotation joint angle is critical in assessing the shoulder function, especially in the clinical practice as it plays a key role in evaluating activities of daily living and monitoring the rehabilitation progress. This study analyzed the effectiveness of using a marker cluster placed over the proximal epiphysis of the ulna to measure humeral axial rotation with respect to the thorax, comparing it with the traditional method that uses a cluster placed on the upper arm. Data were collected simultaneously using the proposed indirect approach and a conventional marker cluster to analyze three internal/external rotations performed in the Ski-Pose, frontal, and sagittal plane. Linear regressions for time series comparison reported a coefficient of determination R<sup>2</sup> > 0.9919 in all tasks.The linear coefficients (a<sub>1</sub>) were as follows: Ski-Pose (a<sub>1</sub> = 0.64 ± 0.10), frontal plane (a<sub>1</sub> = 0.74 ± 0.05), and sagittal plane (a<sub>1</sub> = 0.73 ± 0.04). Three additional planar tasks were recorded for concurrent validity and RMSE was reported for the main joint angle, obtaining a maximum of 3.87° for the pure flexion/extension task and 1.94° for the abduction/adduction task. A forearm pronation/supination task without axial rotation yielded a maximum error standard deviation of 2.64°. Proximal ulna tracking showed a statistically higher maximum range of motion than humeral tracking in pure axial rotation tasks. This indirect tracking approach is a promising alternative to the traditional cluster technique due to its reduced sensitivity to soft tissue artifacts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biomechanics
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112643
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Humeral axial rotation measurement through a proximal ulna marker cluster

Andreas Kontaxis, Arianna Carnevale, Lawrence V. Gulotta, Umile Giuseppe Longo et al.
Journal of Biomechanics
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Humeral axial rotation measurement through a proximal ulna marker cluster

Andreas Kontaxis, Arianna Carnevale, Lawrence V. Gulotta, Umile Giuseppe Longo, Lorenzo De Sanctis, Minah Waraich
article en

Abstract

Accurate measurement of internal/external rotation joint angle is critical in assessing the shoulder function, especially in the clinical practice as it plays a key role in evaluating activities of daily living and monitoring the rehabilitation progress. This study analyzed the effectiveness of using a marker cluster placed over the proximal epiphysis of the ulna to measure humeral axial rotation with respect to the thorax, comparing it with the traditional method that uses a cluster placed on the upper arm. Data were collected simultaneously using the proposed indirect approach and a conventional marker cluster to analyze three internal/external rotations performed in the Ski-Pose, frontal, and sagittal plane. Linear regressions for time series comparison reported a coefficient of determination R<sup>2</sup> > 0.9919 in all tasks.The linear coefficients (a<sub>1</sub>) were as follows: Ski-Pose (a<sub>1</sub> = 0.64 ± 0.10), frontal plane (a<sub>1</sub> = 0.74 ± 0.05), and sagittal plane (a<sub>1</sub> = 0.73 ± 0.04). Three additional planar tasks were recorded for concurrent validity and RMSE was reported for the main joint angle, obtaining a maximum of 3.87° for the pure flexion/extension task and 1.94° for the abduction/adduction task. A forearm pronation/supination task without axial rotation yielded a maximum error standard deviation of 2.64°. Proximal ulna tracking showed a statistically higher maximum range of motion than humeral tracking in pure axial rotation tasks. This indirect tracking approach is a promising alternative to the traditional cluster technique due to its reduced sensitivity to soft tissue artifacts.

Journal of BiomechanicsVol. 185
Hospital for Special Surgery (US), Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT), Campus Bio Medico University Hospital (IT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.