Carbon footprint and greenhouse gas emissions of different rice-based cropping systems using LCA

There are many cropping systems on floodplain soils, but greenhouse gas (GHG) emission balances of these agricultural systems are rarely reported. Carbon (C) footprints of agricultural products were assessed using a co-designed life cycle assessment tool in major cropping systems in Bangladesh: rice-rice-rice (R-R-R/boro-aus-aman), rice-fallow-rice (R-F-R/boro-fallow-aman), maize-fallow-rice (M-F-R), wheat-mungbean-rice (W-Mu-R), and potato-rice-fallow (P-R-F) along with the field measurement of some of the systems. The rice system with dryland crops had higher nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) emissions (3.8 in maize, 4.5 in potato and 0.92 kg N<sub>2</sub>O-N ha<sup>-1</sup> in mungbean) than sole rice (0.73 in boro, 0.57 in aus and 1.94 kg N<sub>2</sub>O-N ha<sup>-1</sup> in aman) systems but methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions exhibited the opposite. Methane dominated, accounting for 50-80% of total emissions in rice systems. The boro rice-based systems (R-R-R and R-F-R) had the highest C footprint (ca. 25.8 and 19.2 Mg CO<sub>2</sub>e ha<sup>-1</sup>) while the P-F-R (12.3 Mg CO<sub>2</sub>e ha<sup>-1</sup>) and M-F-R (12.6 Mg CO<sub>2</sub>e ha<sup>-1</sup>) had the lowest C footprint. Boro and aus were more suitable to reduce C footprint. Measured CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O data agreed well with the IPCC Tier 1 estimates but further study on GHG measurements in other agroecosystems and cropping systems are required to validate the estimation for adopting suitable GHG mitigation strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90157-2
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon footprint and greenhouse gas emissions of different rice-based cropping systems using LCA

Farah Mahjabin, Abdullah Al Asif, Maximilian Bauer, Md. Shamim Hossan et al.
9 citations
Scientific Reports
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
15.45
article

Carbon footprint and greenhouse gas emissions of different rice-based cropping systems using LCA

Farah Mahjabin, Abdullah Al Asif, Maximilian Bauer, Md. Shamim Hossan, Eduardo Aguilera, Alberto Sanz-Cobeña, Jannatul Ferdous, M. M. R. Jahangir, Mohammad Mostafa Zaman, Hassan Ahmad, Christoph Müller
article en
9 citations

Abstract

There are many cropping systems on floodplain soils, but greenhouse gas (GHG) emission balances of these agricultural systems are rarely reported. Carbon (C) footprints of agricultural products were assessed using a co-designed life cycle assessment tool in major cropping systems in Bangladesh: rice-rice-rice (R-R-R/boro-aus-aman), rice-fallow-rice (R-F-R/boro-fallow-aman), maize-fallow-rice (M-F-R), wheat-mungbean-rice (W-Mu-R), and potato-rice-fallow (P-R-F) along with the field measurement of some of the systems. The rice system with dryland crops had higher nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) emissions (3.8 in maize, 4.5 in potato and 0.92 kg N<sub>2</sub>O-N ha<sup>-1</sup> in mungbean) than sole rice (0.73 in boro, 0.57 in aus and 1.94 kg N<sub>2</sub>O-N ha<sup>-1</sup> in aman) systems but methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions exhibited the opposite. Methane dominated, accounting for 50-80% of total emissions in rice systems. The boro rice-based systems (R-R-R and R-F-R) had the highest C footprint (ca. 25.8 and 19.2 Mg CO<sub>2</sub>e ha<sup>-1</sup>) while the P-F-R (12.3 Mg CO<sub>2</sub>e ha<sup>-1</sup>) and M-F-R (12.6 Mg CO<sub>2</sub>e ha<sup>-1</sup>) had the lowest C footprint. Boro and aus were more suitable to reduce C footprint. Measured CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O data agreed well with the IPCC Tier 1 estimates but further study on GHG measurements in other agroecosystems and cropping systems are required to validate the estimation for adopting suitable GHG mitigation strategies.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University College Dublin (IE), Leibniz University Hannover (DE), International Atomic Energy Agency (AT), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES), Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE), Bangladesh Agricultural University (BD)
International Atomic Energy Agency
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
15.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.