Battles for History (N.A. Polevoy Contra N.M. Karamzin): Experience of the Historical and Philosophical Comparative Studies

The article examines the concept of Russian history, which was proposed by N.A. Polevoy in a polemic with the “History of the Russian State” by N.M. Karamzin. He titled his work “The History of the Russian People”. This work should be considered in the context of the discussions that have begun around the issues of nationality. Within the framework of S.S. Uvarov’s famous formula “orthodoxy, autocracy, nationality”, this component was the most obscure and, accordingly, aroused the greatest interest. The main directions of Russian thought of that time (Slavophiles, Westernizers, supporters of the concept of “official nationality”, etc.) offered their interpreta-tions of nationality. It seems that N.A. Polevoy failed to propose a concept capable of competing with N.M. Karamzin’s concept, but his attempt to create an alternative deserves attention.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Общество философия история культура
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24158/fik.2025.3.1
Primary Topic
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Battles for History (N.A. Polevoy Contra N.M. Karamzin): Experience of the Historical and Philosophical Comparative Studies

Inna B. Romanenko, Anton Ya. Kozhurin
Общество философия история культура
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
article

Battles for History (N.A. Polevoy Contra N.M. Karamzin): Experience of the Historical and Philosophical Comparative Studies

Inna B. Romanenko, Anton Ya. Kozhurin
article en

Abstract

The article examines the concept of Russian history, which was proposed by N.A. Polevoy in a polemic with the “History of the Russian State” by N.M. Karamzin. He titled his work “The History of the Russian People”. This work should be considered in the context of the discussions that have begun around the issues of nationality. Within the framework of S.S. Uvarov’s famous formula “orthodoxy, autocracy, nationality”, this component was the most obscure and, accordingly, aroused the greatest interest. The main directions of Russian thought of that time (Slavophiles, Westernizers, supporters of the concept of “official nationality”, etc.) offered their interpreta-tions of nationality. It seems that N.A. Polevoy failed to propose a concept capable of competing with N.M. Karamzin’s concept, but his attempt to create an alternative deserves attention.

Общество философия история культура(3)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Battles for History (N.A. Polevoy Contra N.M. Karamzin): Experience of the Historical and Philosophical Comparative Studies — Inna B. Romanenko, Anton Ya. Kozhurin · Общество философия история культура (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS