Women in Science: Where We Stand?—The WHEN Protocol

Gender disparity in scientific fields, identified with the acronym STEM, is a complex issue whose multiple causes have distant origins in time. In the early development of scientific disciplines, women were often denied access to education and professional opportunities, and their contributions to the scientific fields were frequently not recognized. These trends of underrepresentation gave rise to the male-dominated culture in STEM that persists today, as young women often lack female role models and are less likely to pursue careers in STEM, perpetuating the gender gap and limiting women’s influence and visibility in these fields. Here we present the protocol of the WHEN project, which aims to explore the perceptions that high-school students have of scientific careers and of the women in science, investigating whether gender stereotypes persist and can affect decisions about future paths. Through questionnaires, this study investigates the impact of socio-economic variables on the persistence of gender stereotypes and, most importantly, explores the potential for reducing them through direct engagement with female STEM role models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040408
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Women in Science: Where We Stand?—The WHEN Protocol

Giacomo Biganzoli, Francesca Arnaboldi, Alessia Macagno, Maríaluisa Villani et al.
2 citations
Education Sciences
Diversity and Career in Medicine
7.73
article

Women in Science: Where We Stand?—The WHEN Protocol

Giacomo Biganzoli, Francesca Arnaboldi, Alessia Macagno, Maríaluisa Villani, Francesca Bianchi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Gender disparity in scientific fields, identified with the acronym STEM, is a complex issue whose multiple causes have distant origins in time. In the early development of scientific disciplines, women were often denied access to education and professional opportunities, and their contributions to the scientific fields were frequently not recognized. These trends of underrepresentation gave rise to the male-dominated culture in STEM that persists today, as young women often lack female role models and are less likely to pursue careers in STEM, perpetuating the gender gap and limiting women’s influence and visibility in these fields. Here we present the protocol of the WHEN project, which aims to explore the perceptions that high-school students have of scientific careers and of the women in science, investigating whether gender stereotypes persist and can affect decisions about future paths. Through questionnaires, this study investigates the impact of socio-economic variables on the persistence of gender stereotypes and, most importantly, explores the potential for reducing them through direct engagement with female STEM role models.

Education SciencesVol. 15(4)
University of Milan (IT), IRCCS Policlinico San Donato (IT), University of Turin (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Università degli Studi di Milano
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Diversity and Career in Medicine
7.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Women in Science: Where We Stand?—The WHEN Protocol — Giacomo Biganzoli, Francesca Arnaboldi, et al. · Education Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS