In Vivo Study on the Salivary Kinetics of Two Probiotic Strains Delivered via Chewing Gum

Probiotics are increasingly used to promote oral health, with <i>Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus</i> demonstrating proven effectiveness. Additionally, <i>Heyndrickxia coagulans</i> shows promising potential in this field. Chewing gum has recently been proposed as an innovative delivery method for probiotics. This study aimed to evaluate the kinetics in saliva of <i>Heyndrickxia coagulans SNZ1969</i><sup>®</sup> and <i>Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG</i> in microencapsulated and non-microencapsulated forms (LGG<sup>®</sup>) following their administration via sugar-free chewing gums. A randomized cross-over trial was conducted involving 10 volunteers. Participants chewed gums containing one of the probiotic strains for 10 min. Saliva samples were collected at baseline (T<sub>0</sub>) and six subsequent time points over 2 h (T<sub>1</sub>-T<sub>6</sub>). Colony-forming units (CFUs) were identified and quantified. The Tukey's range test was applied to make pairwise comparisons between different probiotics at every time point, between different time points of the same probiotic, and between the area under the curve describing the kinetics of different probiotics in saliva. At T<sub>1</sub>, all probiotics exhibited peak counts, followed by a gradual decline until T<sub>6</sub>. <i>H. coagulans</i> SNZ1969<sup>®</sup> achieved the highest counts at T<sub>1</sub>, T<sub>2</sub>, and T<sub>3</sub> (mean log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL: 6.1 ± 0.5; 5.8 ± 0.5; 5.6 ± 0.5, respectively), while the non-microencapsulated form of LGG<sup>®</sup> peaked at T<sub>4</sub>, T<sub>5</sub>, and T<sub>6</sub> (mean log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL: 4.0 ± 0.7; 3.8 ± 0.9; 3.3 ± 1.3, respectively). The participants reported no adverse effects. Probiotics were detectable in saliva up to 2 h post-administration via chewing gum, indicating its suitability as a delivery vehicle. However, significant variability was observed among participants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Microorganisms
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13040721
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In Vivo Study on the Salivary Kinetics of Two Probiotic Strains Delivered via Chewing Gum

Maria Grazia Cagetti, Claudia Salerno, Silvia Cirio, Simone Guglielmetti et al.
1 citations
Microorganisms
Probiotics and Fermented Foods
1.16
article

In Vivo Study on the Salivary Kinetics of Two Probiotic Strains Delivered via Chewing Gum

Maria Grazia Cagetti, Claudia Salerno, Silvia Cirio, Simone Guglielmetti, Guglielmo Campus, Natalja Kirika, Andrea Sarrica, Valerio Mezzasalma
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Probiotics are increasingly used to promote oral health, with <i>Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus</i> demonstrating proven effectiveness. Additionally, <i>Heyndrickxia coagulans</i> shows promising potential in this field. Chewing gum has recently been proposed as an innovative delivery method for probiotics. This study aimed to evaluate the kinetics in saliva of <i>Heyndrickxia coagulans SNZ1969</i><sup>®</sup> and <i>Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG</i> in microencapsulated and non-microencapsulated forms (LGG<sup>®</sup>) following their administration via sugar-free chewing gums. A randomized cross-over trial was conducted involving 10 volunteers. Participants chewed gums containing one of the probiotic strains for 10 min. Saliva samples were collected at baseline (T<sub>0</sub>) and six subsequent time points over 2 h (T<sub>1</sub>-T<sub>6</sub>). Colony-forming units (CFUs) were identified and quantified. The Tukey's range test was applied to make pairwise comparisons between different probiotics at every time point, between different time points of the same probiotic, and between the area under the curve describing the kinetics of different probiotics in saliva. At T<sub>1</sub>, all probiotics exhibited peak counts, followed by a gradual decline until T<sub>6</sub>. <i>H. coagulans</i> SNZ1969<sup>®</sup> achieved the highest counts at T<sub>1</sub>, T<sub>2</sub>, and T<sub>3</sub> (mean log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL: 6.1 ± 0.5; 5.8 ± 0.5; 5.6 ± 0.5, respectively), while the non-microencapsulated form of LGG<sup>®</sup> peaked at T<sub>4</sub>, T<sub>5</sub>, and T<sub>6</sub> (mean log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL: 4.0 ± 0.7; 3.8 ± 0.9; 3.3 ± 1.3, respectively). The participants reported no adverse effects. Probiotics were detectable in saliva up to 2 h post-administration via chewing gum, indicating its suitability as a delivery vehicle. However, significant variability was observed among participants.

MicroorganismsVol. 13(4)
University of Bern (CH), University of Milan (IT), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT), Saveetha University (IN), Sapienza University of Rome (IT), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Probiotics and Fermented Foods
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.