Tongue pressure and self-assessment of swallowing after total laryngectomy

ABSTRACT Purpose To evaluate tongue pressure, self-perception of swallowing, and whether tongue pressure is correlated with self-perception of swallowing in individuals undergoing total laryngectomy. Methods Cross-sectional study with two groups – with and without total laryngectomy, matched by age and sex to individuals with total laryngectomy. Participants had their tongue tip and dorsum pressure measured and self-assessed their swallowing with the Swallow Outcomes After Laryngectomy questionnaire (SOAL). Results The sample totaled 26 participants, 13 from each group. The mean maximum tongue dorsum pressure was 41.2±18.7 and 27.9±9.3 kilopascals, respectively, in the groups with and without total laryngectomy (p = 0.03). The median maximum tongue tip pressure was 33.7 (23.8-49.3) and 29.1 (22.5-35.7) kilopascals, respectively, in the groups with and without total laryngectomy (p = 0.29). The median SOAL was 6 (2.5-8.5) points in the group with total laryngectomy. The SOAL score was not statistically significantly correlated with tongue tip pressure (r = -0.17; p = 0.58) or dorsum pressure (r = -0.30; p = 0.31). Conclusion Individuals with total laryngectomy had higher tongue dorsum pressure, although there was no difference in tongue tip pressure between individuals with and without total laryngectomy. Tongue pressure was not correlated with self-assessment of swallowing, although tongue tip pressure was correlated with dorsum pressure in individuals with total laryngectomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CoDAS
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/e20240185en
Primary Topic
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tongue pressure and self-assessment of swallowing after total laryngectomy

Mariana Pinheiro Brendim, G Dávid, Natália Carminati
CoDAS
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
article

Tongue pressure and self-assessment of swallowing after total laryngectomy

Mariana Pinheiro Brendim, G Dávid, Natália Carminati
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose To evaluate tongue pressure, self-perception of swallowing, and whether tongue pressure is correlated with self-perception of swallowing in individuals undergoing total laryngectomy. Methods Cross-sectional study with two groups – with and without total laryngectomy, matched by age and sex to individuals with total laryngectomy. Participants had their tongue tip and dorsum pressure measured and self-assessed their swallowing with the Swallow Outcomes After Laryngectomy questionnaire (SOAL). Results The sample totaled 26 participants, 13 from each group. The mean maximum tongue dorsum pressure was 41.2±18.7 and 27.9±9.3 kilopascals, respectively, in the groups with and without total laryngectomy (p = 0.03). The median maximum tongue tip pressure was 33.7 (23.8-49.3) and 29.1 (22.5-35.7) kilopascals, respectively, in the groups with and without total laryngectomy (p = 0.29). The median SOAL was 6 (2.5-8.5) points in the group with total laryngectomy. The SOAL score was not statistically significantly correlated with tongue tip pressure (r = -0.17; p = 0.58) or dorsum pressure (r = -0.30; p = 0.31). Conclusion Individuals with total laryngectomy had higher tongue dorsum pressure, although there was no difference in tongue tip pressure between individuals with and without total laryngectomy. Tongue pressure was not correlated with self-assessment of swallowing, although tongue tip pressure was correlated with dorsum pressure in individuals with total laryngectomy.

CoDASVol. 37(3)
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.