Cyclist Perception–Reaction Time and Stopping Sight Distance for Unexpected Hazards

Cyclist perception–reaction time and deceleration rate have not been previously measured for unexpected hazards, which is a major knowledge gap for the design of safe bicycle facilities. This research aims to determine the distributions of perception–reaction time, deceleration rate, and stopping sight distance for cyclists in response to an unexpected, fixed object in their path that requires an emergency stop. Cyclist braking was measured in response to both unexpected and expected stimuli to balance risk and representation for a total sample of 302 participants. The 85th percentile perception–reaction time for an unexpected hazard was 0.84 s, substantially shorter than in motor vehicle studies and design guidance, possibly due to heightened vigilance when riding a bicycle. In contrast, the 85th percentile deceleration rate was 0.20g (1.96 m/s2), smaller than some design guidance, possibly due to the risk and complexity of hard braking on a bicycle. Lower self-reported confidence when cycling was associated with shorter perception–reaction time and smaller deceleration rate, suggesting increased vigilance and greater caution when braking. Neither age nor gender were significant predictors of perception–reaction time or deceleration rate, although men had higher approach speeds, which increased their total stopping sight distance. These findings provide evidence-based parameter values for design of safe bicycle facilities considering the performance of a diversity of cyclists.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Transportation Engineering Part A Systems
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jtepbs.teeng-8805
Primary Topic
Safety Warnings and Signage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cyclist Perception–Reaction Time and Stopping Sight Distance for Unexpected Hazards

Stephen James Martin, Alexander York Bigazzi
Journal of Transportation Engineering Part A Systems
Safety Warnings and Signage
article

Cyclist Perception–Reaction Time and Stopping Sight Distance for Unexpected Hazards

Stephen James Martin, Alexander York Bigazzi
article en

Abstract

Cyclist perception–reaction time and deceleration rate have not been previously measured for unexpected hazards, which is a major knowledge gap for the design of safe bicycle facilities. This research aims to determine the distributions of perception–reaction time, deceleration rate, and stopping sight distance for cyclists in response to an unexpected, fixed object in their path that requires an emergency stop. Cyclist braking was measured in response to both unexpected and expected stimuli to balance risk and representation for a total sample of 302 participants. The 85th percentile perception–reaction time for an unexpected hazard was 0.84 s, substantially shorter than in motor vehicle studies and design guidance, possibly due to heightened vigilance when riding a bicycle. In contrast, the 85th percentile deceleration rate was 0.20g (1.96 m/s2), smaller than some design guidance, possibly due to the risk and complexity of hard braking on a bicycle. Lower self-reported confidence when cycling was associated with shorter perception–reaction time and smaller deceleration rate, suggesting increased vigilance and greater caution when braking. Neither age nor gender were significant predictors of perception–reaction time or deceleration rate, although men had higher approach speeds, which increased their total stopping sight distance. These findings provide evidence-based parameter values for design of safe bicycle facilities considering the performance of a diversity of cyclists.

Journal of Transportation Engineering Part A SystemsVol. 151(6)
University of British Columbia (CA)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Safety Warnings and Signage
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.