The C-terminal regions of the GLP-1 and GIP receptors are not the key determinants of their differential arrestin recruitment but modulate the rate of receptor endocytosis

<b>Introduction:</b> Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are important regulators of metabolism and mediate the incretin effect. This glucose-dependent potentiation of insulin secretion is severely impaired in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus. While pharmacological doses of GLP-1 can overcome this impairment, the same is not true for GIP. The reasons for this are unclear. However, differences in the signalling profiles of the GLP-1 and GIP receptors (GLP-1R and GIPR) may contribute. GLP-1R and GIPR are closely related G protein-coupled receptors but differ in their ability to recruit arrestin, GIPR being relatively poorer. Furthermore, these receptors have been reported to utilize different mechanisms to undergo agonist-induced internalization. <b>Methods:</b> This study aimed to identify the role of the C-terminal region of the two receptors in their differing signalling behaviour using chimeric receptors where the C-terminal tail of one receptor was replaced with that of the other. <b>Results:</b> Replacement of the C-terminal tail had only limited effects on G protein and arrestin recruitment to either receptor. GIP-stimulated internalisation of GIPR occurred at a significantly (<i>P</i> < 0.001) slower rate than GLP-1-stimulated internalisation of GLP-1R. Replacement of the C-terminal tail of GIPR with that of GLP-1R significantly (<i>P</i> < 0.05) increased the internalization rate but not to the rate of wild-type GLP-1R. The reciprocal substitution significantly (<i>P</i> < 0.005) decreased internalization rate. <b>Conclusion:</b> These data show that the C-terminal region of GLP-1R and GIPR is not the critical determinant of their differing ability to recruit arrestin but modulates receptor endocytosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1528295
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The C-terminal regions of the GLP-1 and GIP receptors are not the key determinants of their differential arrestin recruitment but modulate the rate of receptor endocytosis

Bashaier Al‐Zaid, Suleiman Al‐Sabah
2 citations
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
1.61
article

The C-terminal regions of the GLP-1 and GIP receptors are not the key determinants of their differential arrestin recruitment but modulate the rate of receptor endocytosis

Bashaier Al‐Zaid, Suleiman Al‐Sabah
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are important regulators of metabolism and mediate the incretin effect. This glucose-dependent potentiation of insulin secretion is severely impaired in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus. While pharmacological doses of GLP-1 can overcome this impairment, the same is not true for GIP. The reasons for this are unclear. However, differences in the signalling profiles of the GLP-1 and GIP receptors (GLP-1R and GIPR) may contribute. GLP-1R and GIPR are closely related G protein-coupled receptors but differ in their ability to recruit arrestin, GIPR being relatively poorer. Furthermore, these receptors have been reported to utilize different mechanisms to undergo agonist-induced internalization. <b>Methods:</b> This study aimed to identify the role of the C-terminal region of the two receptors in their differing signalling behaviour using chimeric receptors where the C-terminal tail of one receptor was replaced with that of the other. <b>Results:</b> Replacement of the C-terminal tail had only limited effects on G protein and arrestin recruitment to either receptor. GIP-stimulated internalisation of GIPR occurred at a significantly (<i>P</i> < 0.001) slower rate than GLP-1-stimulated internalisation of GLP-1R. Replacement of the C-terminal tail of GIPR with that of GLP-1R significantly (<i>P</i> < 0.05) increased the internalization rate but not to the rate of wild-type GLP-1R. The reciprocal substitution significantly (<i>P</i> < 0.005) decreased internalization rate. <b>Conclusion:</b> These data show that the C-terminal region of GLP-1R and GIPR is not the critical determinant of their differing ability to recruit arrestin but modulates receptor endocytosis.

Frontiers in PharmacologyVol. 16
Kuwait University (KW)
Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Sciences, Kuwait University
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
1.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.