Ethical Imperatives for Harmonizing Brain Death Standards in the United States and Globally

The determination of brain death/death by neurological criteria (BD/DNC) is a critical medical and legal process. The Uniform Determination of Death Act (UDDA) provides a legal framework, yet significant state-bystate inconsistencies persist in its interpretation and implementation. These disparities create ethical concerns related to justice, patient autonomy, informed consent, and public trust in medical determinations of death. This paper argues for urgently harmonizing BD/DNC criteria across the United States and globally to uphold ethical medical practice, ensure consistency in end-of-life care, and preserve public confidence in the organ donation system. Ethical considerations are examined, including fairness in healthcare access, respect for religious and cultural beliefs, and the implications for organ procurement policies. The call for national and international standardization aligns with bioethical principles and medical best practices, aiming to reinforce ethical and legal integrity in BD/DNC determination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
General Reanimatology
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2025-2-27-02
Primary Topic
Organ Donation and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical Imperatives for Harmonizing Brain Death Standards in the United States and Globally

Beata Sániová, Calixto Machado, Arthur D. Schiff, José Javier Sánchez et al.
General Reanimatology
Organ Donation and Transplantation
article

Ethical Imperatives for Harmonizing Brain Death Standards in the United States and Globally

Beata Sániová, Calixto Machado, Arthur D. Schiff, José Javier Sánchez, Michal Drobný
article en

Abstract

The determination of brain death/death by neurological criteria (BD/DNC) is a critical medical and legal process. The Uniform Determination of Death Act (UDDA) provides a legal framework, yet significant state-bystate inconsistencies persist in its interpretation and implementation. These disparities create ethical concerns related to justice, patient autonomy, informed consent, and public trust in medical determinations of death. This paper argues for urgently harmonizing BD/DNC criteria across the United States and globally to uphold ethical medical practice, ensure consistency in end-of-life care, and preserve public confidence in the organ donation system. Ethical considerations are examined, including fairness in healthcare access, respect for religious and cultural beliefs, and the implications for organ procurement policies. The call for national and international standardization aligns with bioethical principles and medical best practices, aiming to reinforce ethical and legal integrity in BD/DNC determination.

General Reanimatology
Northside Hospital (US), Comenius University Bratislava (SK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Organ Donation and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ethical Imperatives for Harmonizing Brain Death Standards in the United States and Globally — Beata Sániová, Calixto Machado, et al. · General Reanimatology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS