A learning module for generative AI literacy in a biomedical engineering classroom

Purpose Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), especially Large Language Model (LLM)-based chatbots such as ChatGPT, has reshaped students’ learning and engagement in higher education. Yet, technical details of GenAI are largely inapproachable to most students. This article develops a learning module for GenAI and seeks to examine whether this module can potentially affect students’ perceptions toward GenAI. Methods We implemented a one-lecture (60-min) module on GenAI models, with primary focus on structures of LLM-based chatbots, during the last week of a Biomedical Engineering (BME) Machine Learning course. A mixed-methods survey on perceptions of GenAI was distributed to the students before and after the module. Paired t-tests and regression analyses were used to analyze the Likert-scale quantitative questions and thematic coding was performed for the free-response questions. Results Students ( N = 13) reported significantly stronger approval on favorability to use GenAI in medicine ( p = 0.015), understanding of LLM-based chatbots ( p < 0.001), confidence on using LLM-based chatbots ( p = 0.027), optimism on future development of LLMs ( p = 0.020), and perception of instructor’s attitude toward GenAI ( p = 0.033). Students maintained a neutral view on accuracy of LLM-generated answers and a negative view on the ability of generating bias-free answers in LLMs. The primary contributors identified in students’ intentions to use LLMs are self-efficacy in using the LLM outputs and lower precepted bias of LLMs. The impression of GenAI for students shifted from primarily LLM-based chatbots and generative work to components and training process of GenAI. After the module, students reported a clear understanding of tokenizers and word embeddings while expressing confusion on transformers. Conclusion A module on the details of GenAI models shifted the students’ attitudes to GenAI models positively while still being acutely aware of its limitations. We believe that inclusion of such modules in a modern engineering curriculum will help students achieve AI literacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1551385
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Biomedical and Engineering Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A learning module for generative AI literacy in a biomedical engineering classroom

Angelika Aldea Tamura, Xianglong Wang, Tiffany Chan
3 citations
Frontiers in Education
Biomedical and Engineering Education
2.02
article

A learning module for generative AI literacy in a biomedical engineering classroom

Angelika Aldea Tamura, Xianglong Wang, Tiffany Chan
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Purpose Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), especially Large Language Model (LLM)-based chatbots such as ChatGPT, has reshaped students’ learning and engagement in higher education. Yet, technical details of GenAI are largely inapproachable to most students. This article develops a learning module for GenAI and seeks to examine whether this module can potentially affect students’ perceptions toward GenAI. Methods We implemented a one-lecture (60-min) module on GenAI models, with primary focus on structures of LLM-based chatbots, during the last week of a Biomedical Engineering (BME) Machine Learning course. A mixed-methods survey on perceptions of GenAI was distributed to the students before and after the module. Paired t-tests and regression analyses were used to analyze the Likert-scale quantitative questions and thematic coding was performed for the free-response questions. Results Students ( N = 13) reported significantly stronger approval on favorability to use GenAI in medicine ( p = 0.015), understanding of LLM-based chatbots ( p < 0.001), confidence on using LLM-based chatbots ( p = 0.027), optimism on future development of LLMs ( p = 0.020), and perception of instructor’s attitude toward GenAI ( p = 0.033). Students maintained a neutral view on accuracy of LLM-generated answers and a negative view on the ability of generating bias-free answers in LLMs. The primary contributors identified in students’ intentions to use LLMs are self-efficacy in using the LLM outputs and lower precepted bias of LLMs. The impression of GenAI for students shifted from primarily LLM-based chatbots and generative work to components and training process of GenAI. After the module, students reported a clear understanding of tokenizers and word embeddings while expressing confusion on transformers. Conclusion A module on the details of GenAI models shifted the students’ attitudes to GenAI models positively while still being acutely aware of its limitations. We believe that inclusion of such modules in a modern engineering curriculum will help students achieve AI literacy.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
University of California, Davis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Biomedical and Engineering Education
2.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.