Life Satisfaction and Subjective Well-Being on the Road to Happiness: An Application of Structural Equation Modeling

This study aims to elucidate the relationships between happiness, life satisfaction, and subjective vitality among student-athletes. Conducted using a correlational survey method, the research included a total of 400 students (149 female and 251 male) enrolled in sports sciences programs across three different universities (Mean age = 21.31 ± 2.32). The data collection tools employed were the “Subjective Happiness Scale (SHS)”, the “Subjective Vitality Scale (SVS)”, and the “Life Satisfaction Scale (LSS)”. The suitability of the data for analysis was determined based on skewness and kurtosis values. The data were analyzed using IBM AMOS V25 software (Chicago, USA), and the relationships among happiness, life satisfaction, and vitality were tested using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The structural equation model revealed that the path coefficient between vitality and happiness was β1 = 0.541, p = 0.001, and the path coefficient between life satisfaction and happiness was β1 = 0.441, p = 0.001, both of which were statistically significant. In other words, life satisfaction explains 44% of subjective well-being, while subjective vitality accounts for 54% of subjective well-being. The results suggest that increasing individuals' levels of life satisfaction and subjective vitality may also enhance their level of happiness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Sport Education and Sciences
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62425/rses.1526877
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life Satisfaction and Subjective Well-Being on the Road to Happiness: An Application of Structural Equation Modeling

Yakup Paktaş, Ömer Faruk YAZICI, Mustafa Barış SOMOĞLU, Emine İşbilir
2 citations
Research in Sport Education and Sciences
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
4.88
article

Life Satisfaction and Subjective Well-Being on the Road to Happiness: An Application of Structural Equation Modeling

Yakup Paktaş, Ömer Faruk YAZICI, Mustafa Barış SOMOĞLU, Emine İşbilir
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study aims to elucidate the relationships between happiness, life satisfaction, and subjective vitality among student-athletes. Conducted using a correlational survey method, the research included a total of 400 students (149 female and 251 male) enrolled in sports sciences programs across three different universities (Mean age = 21.31 ± 2.32). The data collection tools employed were the “Subjective Happiness Scale (SHS)”, the “Subjective Vitality Scale (SVS)”, and the “Life Satisfaction Scale (LSS)”. The suitability of the data for analysis was determined based on skewness and kurtosis values. The data were analyzed using IBM AMOS V25 software (Chicago, USA), and the relationships among happiness, life satisfaction, and vitality were tested using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The structural equation model revealed that the path coefficient between vitality and happiness was β1 = 0.541, p = 0.001, and the path coefficient between life satisfaction and happiness was β1 = 0.441, p = 0.001, both of which were statistically significant. In other words, life satisfaction explains 44% of subjective well-being, while subjective vitality accounts for 54% of subjective well-being. The results suggest that increasing individuals' levels of life satisfaction and subjective vitality may also enhance their level of happiness.

Research in Sport Education and SciencesVol. 27(1)
Gümüşhane University (TR), Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
4.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.