Unpacking the Adjudication Procedure in the 1999 FIDIC Forms of Contract

This paper examines the Dispute Adjudication Board (DAB) mechanism in the 1999 FIDIC Forms of Contract, highlighting its role in resolving construction disputes efficiently. The research explores the legal framework, jurisdiction, and procedural aspects of the DAB, emphasising the distinctions between standing and ad hoc DABs. A key focus is on Subclause 20.4, which governs dispute referral and decision-making processes, ensuring contractual compliance while maintaining project continuity. Additionally, the study analyses jurisdictional challenges in defining disputes and the enforceability of DAB decisions under international construction law. By examining case law and industry practices, this research provides valuable insights for contractors, legal professionals, and project managers on optimising dispute resolution within FIDIC contracts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Applied Science Engineering and Technology
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59324/ejaset.2025.3(2).12
Primary Topic
European and International Contract Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unpacking the Adjudication Procedure in the 1999 FIDIC Forms of Contract

Charles Gavamukulya
European Journal of Applied Science Engineering and Technology
European and International Contract Law
article

Unpacking the Adjudication Procedure in the 1999 FIDIC Forms of Contract

Charles Gavamukulya
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the Dispute Adjudication Board (DAB) mechanism in the 1999 FIDIC Forms of Contract, highlighting its role in resolving construction disputes efficiently. The research explores the legal framework, jurisdiction, and procedural aspects of the DAB, emphasising the distinctions between standing and ad hoc DABs. A key focus is on Subclause 20.4, which governs dispute referral and decision-making processes, ensuring contractual compliance while maintaining project continuity. Additionally, the study analyses jurisdictional challenges in defining disputes and the enforceability of DAB decisions under international construction law. By examining case law and industry practices, this research provides valuable insights for contractors, legal professionals, and project managers on optimising dispute resolution within FIDIC contracts.

European Journal of Applied Science Engineering and TechnologyVol. 3(2)
Leeds Beckett University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
European and International Contract Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Unpacking the Adjudication Procedure in the 1999 FIDIC Forms of Contract — Charles Gavamukulya · European Journal of Applied Science Engineering and Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS