What’s the Matter with You, Rock?!: What the Study of Daoism Can Say about Religious Images

Abstract This essay is about the trouble we scholars have with addressing religious images and object agency. It introduces one moment in a Daoist ritual to suggest alternative models for thinking about what images do. To do so, it intentionally looks outside scholarly discourse and to the music of Nina Simone to frame Religious Studies’ concern over Idol Anxiety as a way to circumvent the limits of what we can and cannot say about images. By reframing the paradigm of what images mean into the emic imperative of what images do , we avail ourselves to untapped models and vocabularies to address non-subjective agency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Method & Theory in the Study of Religion
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-bja10142
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What’s the Matter with You, Rock?!: What the Study of Daoism Can Say about Religious Images

Michael E. Naparstek
Method & Theory in the Study of Religion
Chinese history and philosophy
article

What’s the Matter with You, Rock?!: What the Study of Daoism Can Say about Religious Images

Michael E. Naparstek
article en

Abstract

Abstract This essay is about the trouble we scholars have with addressing religious images and object agency. It introduces one moment in a Daoist ritual to suggest alternative models for thinking about what images do. To do so, it intentionally looks outside scholarly discourse and to the music of Nina Simone to frame Religious Studies’ concern over Idol Anxiety as a way to circumvent the limits of what we can and cannot say about images. By reframing the paradigm of what images mean into the emic imperative of what images do , we avail ourselves to untapped models and vocabularies to address non-subjective agency.

Method & Theory in the Study of ReligionVol. 37(2)
University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.