Capitalization, Optimization, and Choice

Recently proposed alterations to the United States Patent Act would unsettle the US Supreme Court’s 2013 invalidation of isolated gene patents. Simultaneously, biotechnological advances have led to the increasing availability of pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT), which enables the (de-)selection of embryos following in vitro fertilization and prior to implantation. This paper uses the patent debates as an opening through which to examine the nexus of patent law, technoscientific capitalism, and reproductive genetic technologies—specifically, a form of pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT-M) that identifies specific genetic sequences that contribute to disease. Using feminist science studies and reproductive justice frameworks, I argue that the gendered imaginary of “high-risk” investment and health risk management, coupled with the privatization of biomaterial disproportionately produced by women, may exacerbate racial and economic inequities in access to reproductive healthcare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Catalyst Feminism Theory Technoscience
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v11i1.39402
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Capitalization, Optimization, and Choice

Leifa Mayers
Catalyst Feminism Theory Technoscience
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

Capitalization, Optimization, and Choice

Leifa Mayers
article en

Abstract

Recently proposed alterations to the United States Patent Act would unsettle the US Supreme Court’s 2013 invalidation of isolated gene patents. Simultaneously, biotechnological advances have led to the increasing availability of pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT), which enables the (de-)selection of embryos following in vitro fertilization and prior to implantation. This paper uses the patent debates as an opening through which to examine the nexus of patent law, technoscientific capitalism, and reproductive genetic technologies—specifically, a form of pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT-M) that identifies specific genetic sequences that contribute to disease. Using feminist science studies and reproductive justice frameworks, I argue that the gendered imaginary of “high-risk” investment and health risk management, coupled with the privatization of biomaterial disproportionately produced by women, may exacerbate racial and economic inequities in access to reproductive healthcare.

Catalyst Feminism Theory TechnoscienceVol. 11(1)
Grand Valley State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.