A hybrid approach for enhanced tree volume estimation of complex trees using terrestrial LiDAR

Accurate forest biomass estimation is crucial for ecological research and policymaking, yet traditional methods relying on allometric equations often struggle with structural variability in diverse forest ecosystems. Quantitative Structure Models (QSMs) using terrestrial LiDAR have improved tree volume estimation, but existing models face challenges in accurately representing complex tree geometries, particularly buttressed trees with non-cylindrical trunks. This study evaluates four widely used QSMs – TreeQSM, AdQSM, AdTree, and SimpleForest – using terrestrial LiDAR point clouds from 191 trees. Results indicate that TreeQSM achieves the lowest Mean Absolute Percentage Deviation (MAPD) of 18.16%, followed by AdQSM (25.23%), while AdTree (31.22%) and SimpleForest (56.86%) exhibit higher errors. The consistent residuals and an R2 value of 0.94 across a diverse dataset underscore the robustness of TreeQSM. Additionally, TreeQSM’s built-in noise filtering algorithm enhances its adaptability to noisy data, achieving a significant reduction in MAPD from 51.7% to 12.05% in datasets affected by noise. This study also investigates the challenges of modeling noisy data and the consequential loss of small branches by the noise filtering algorithm. Delving into the contribution and relevance of higher-order branches, the study reveals their marginal impact – accounting for approximately 5.2% of the total tree volume (including both stems and branches) – while also highlighting the increased uncertainty in volume estimations caused by their inclusion. These findings advocate for a focused modeling approach that emphasizes primary tree structures, potentially omitting detailed rendering of higher-order branches (i.e. those beyond the 2nd order) to maintain accuracy. In addressing the inadequacies of traditional QSM models in handling trees with complex geometries, this study introduces a novel hybrid approach, integrating Surface Reconstruction and QSM techniques. This approach significantly improves volume estimation for trees with complex geometries, such as buttresses. This method is fully automated, achieving a detection accuracy of 99% for buttressed trees and reducing the MAPD to 14.68%, a substantial improvement over the 21.35% MAPD observed with traditional TreeQSM applications. By advancing the understanding of the potential and limitations of different QSM models and introducing a hybrid modeling technique, this research contributes to enhanced forest carbon stock assessments. It offers a nuanced, precise, and adaptable strategy for volume estimation, thereby significantly aiding forestry management and ecological conservation efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GIScience & Remote Sensing
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2025.2474836
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A hybrid approach for enhanced tree volume estimation of complex trees using terrestrial LiDAR

Moonis Ali, Bharat Lohani, Markus Hollaus, Norbert Pfeifer
8 citations
GIScience & Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
6.39
article

A hybrid approach for enhanced tree volume estimation of complex trees using terrestrial LiDAR

Moonis Ali, Bharat Lohani, Markus Hollaus, Norbert Pfeifer
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Accurate forest biomass estimation is crucial for ecological research and policymaking, yet traditional methods relying on allometric equations often struggle with structural variability in diverse forest ecosystems. Quantitative Structure Models (QSMs) using terrestrial LiDAR have improved tree volume estimation, but existing models face challenges in accurately representing complex tree geometries, particularly buttressed trees with non-cylindrical trunks. This study evaluates four widely used QSMs – TreeQSM, AdQSM, AdTree, and SimpleForest – using terrestrial LiDAR point clouds from 191 trees. Results indicate that TreeQSM achieves the lowest Mean Absolute Percentage Deviation (MAPD) of 18.16%, followed by AdQSM (25.23%), while AdTree (31.22%) and SimpleForest (56.86%) exhibit higher errors. The consistent residuals and an R2 value of 0.94 across a diverse dataset underscore the robustness of TreeQSM. Additionally, TreeQSM’s built-in noise filtering algorithm enhances its adaptability to noisy data, achieving a significant reduction in MAPD from 51.7% to 12.05% in datasets affected by noise. This study also investigates the challenges of modeling noisy data and the consequential loss of small branches by the noise filtering algorithm. Delving into the contribution and relevance of higher-order branches, the study reveals their marginal impact – accounting for approximately 5.2% of the total tree volume (including both stems and branches) – while also highlighting the increased uncertainty in volume estimations caused by their inclusion. These findings advocate for a focused modeling approach that emphasizes primary tree structures, potentially omitting detailed rendering of higher-order branches (i.e. those beyond the 2nd order) to maintain accuracy. In addressing the inadequacies of traditional QSM models in handling trees with complex geometries, this study introduces a novel hybrid approach, integrating Surface Reconstruction and QSM techniques. This approach significantly improves volume estimation for trees with complex geometries, such as buttresses. This method is fully automated, achieving a detection accuracy of 99% for buttressed trees and reducing the MAPD to 14.68%, a substantial improvement over the 21.35% MAPD observed with traditional TreeQSM applications. By advancing the understanding of the potential and limitations of different QSM models and introducing a hybrid modeling technique, this research contributes to enhanced forest carbon stock assessments. It offers a nuanced, precise, and adaptable strategy for volume estimation, thereby significantly aiding forestry management and ecological conservation efforts.

GIScience & Remote SensingVol. 62(1)
TU Wien (AT), Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
6.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.