Sociotechnical Infrastructures and Textures of Care

This article explores the possibilities and limitations of care within sociotechnical infrastructures, including semi-automated, bureaucratic, and machine learning systems. Emerging from an ongoing research project that started during the global pandemic and grounded in ethics of care approaches, our project critically interrogates how such infrastructures not only create conditions for care but also reconfigure care itself to align with their underlying ideologies and discourses. Drawing on theories of care, particularly María Puig de la Bellacasa’s (2017) conceptualization of work-affect-politics, the article examines the politics and practices of care shaped by grant management infrastructures that underpin academic work. These infrastructures are framed as contexts where social actors and technological artifacts interweave into unified systems, and in the context of this article refer to the lived experiences of conducting research. Ultimately, the article argues that sociotechnical infrastructures function as “conditions of possibility” for care, and as indicative of the now-endemic ways that work-affect-politics is enmeshed in sociotechnical infrastructures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Catalyst Feminism Theory Technoscience
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v11i1.42898
Primary Topic
Crafts, Textile, and Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sociotechnical Infrastructures and Textures of Care

Helen Thornham, Joanne Armitage
Catalyst Feminism Theory Technoscience
Crafts, Textile, and Design
article

Sociotechnical Infrastructures and Textures of Care

Helen Thornham, Joanne Armitage
article en

Abstract

This article explores the possibilities and limitations of care within sociotechnical infrastructures, including semi-automated, bureaucratic, and machine learning systems. Emerging from an ongoing research project that started during the global pandemic and grounded in ethics of care approaches, our project critically interrogates how such infrastructures not only create conditions for care but also reconfigure care itself to align with their underlying ideologies and discourses. Drawing on theories of care, particularly María Puig de la Bellacasa’s (2017) conceptualization of work-affect-politics, the article examines the politics and practices of care shaped by grant management infrastructures that underpin academic work. These infrastructures are framed as contexts where social actors and technological artifacts interweave into unified systems, and in the context of this article refer to the lived experiences of conducting research. Ultimately, the article argues that sociotechnical infrastructures function as “conditions of possibility” for care, and as indicative of the now-endemic ways that work-affect-politics is enmeshed in sociotechnical infrastructures.

Catalyst Feminism Theory TechnoscienceVol. 11(1)
University of Leeds (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Crafts, Textile, and Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.