W sprawie konstytucyjności uchwały Sejmu RP z dnia 19 grudnia 2023 r. o powołaniu tzw. wizowej Komisji Śledczej

The Sejm’s position regarding the application of a group of Deputies to examine certain provisions of the resolution provides that Article 2 of the resolution, which defines the scope of the Sejm’s investigation entrusted to the designated investigative committee, conforms to the Constitution. According to the applicants, the Sejm should not appoint an investigative committee to investigate a specific case as long as other state bodies responsible for prosecuting crimes conduct their proceedings to the same or similar extent. In the author’s opinion, it is not justified to make the functioning of the investigative committee dependent on the actions taken by other state bodies under separate legal procedures. The Sejm’s investigation has autonomous objectives and effects, which do not exclude a parallel investigation of the case in the paradigm of repressive proceedings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zeszyty Prawnicze Biura Analiz Sejmowych
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31268/zpbas.2024.51
Primary Topic
Polish Law and Legal System
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

W sprawie konstytucyjności uchwały Sejmu RP z dnia 19 grudnia 2023 r. o powołaniu tzw. wizowej Komisji Śledczej

Piotr Radziewicz
Zeszyty Prawnicze Biura Analiz Sejmowych
Polish Law and Legal System
article

W sprawie konstytucyjności uchwały Sejmu RP z dnia 19 grudnia 2023 r. o powołaniu tzw. wizowej Komisji Śledczej

Piotr Radziewicz
article en

Abstract

The Sejm’s position regarding the application of a group of Deputies to examine certain provisions of the resolution provides that Article 2 of the resolution, which defines the scope of the Sejm’s investigation entrusted to the designated investigative committee, conforms to the Constitution. According to the applicants, the Sejm should not appoint an investigative committee to investigate a specific case as long as other state bodies responsible for prosecuting crimes conduct their proceedings to the same or similar extent. In the author’s opinion, it is not justified to make the functioning of the investigative committee dependent on the actions taken by other state bodies under separate legal procedures. The Sejm’s investigation has autonomous objectives and effects, which do not exclude a parallel investigation of the case in the paradigm of repressive proceedings.

Zeszyty Prawnicze Biura Analiz SejmowychVol. 82(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Polish Law and Legal System
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.