“Help Being Passed From One Person to the Next”: Factors Defining the Development, Challenges, and Successes of Faculty Peer Mentoring Relationships During Mentee Transitions to Engineering Education Research

Background: Formal and informal faculty peer mentoring relationships are important components of the development, growth, and trajectory of faculty. Yet this nuanced process of faculty peer mentorship remains an underexplored social phenomenon, especially regarding faculty transitions into engineering education research (EER) fields. Awards from the National Science Foundation like the NSF Research Initiation in Engineering Formations scaffold this process by providing an opportunity for engineering faculty to conduct funded EER projects with the guidance of an experienced mentor. Purpose/Hypothesis: Dynamics in faculty peer mentoring relationships influence their development. Here, we explore faculty peer mentorship in EER and define factors impacting the mentoring experience of faculty transitioning to conduct EER. We answer: How are engineering faculty participating in a specific NSF program trained and integrated into the EER community? Design/Method: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 grantees, including ten mentors and eight mentees. Data analysis followed an iterative thematic coding procedure to identify concepts that helped explain the mentorship experience of mentors and mentees. Results: We define aspects of faculty peer mentoring relationships: power dynamics, mentorship location, and team composition. These three elements of grantee teams emerged as themes which influenced, both positively and negatively, the experiences of grantees. Conclusions: By considering these factors when entering a formal peer mentoring relationship, prospective mentors and mentees preparing for small grant opportunities supporting the development of new faculty conducting EER can better anticipate challenges or needs in their mentoring relationships. These results can be extended to similarly structured mentoring contexts and inform research on other peer mentoring relationships in academic contexts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Engineering Education
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21061/see.155
Primary Topic
Mentoring and Academic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Help Being Passed From One Person to the Next”: Factors Defining the Development, Challenges, and Successes of Faculty Peer Mentoring Relationships During Mentee Transitions to Engineering Education Research

Evan Ko, Allyson Barlow, Kelly Cross, Joseph Mirabelli et al.
Studies in Engineering Education
Mentoring and Academic Development
article

“Help Being Passed From One Person to the Next”: Factors Defining the Development, Challenges, and Successes of Faculty Peer Mentoring Relationships During Mentee Transitions to Engineering Education Research

Evan Ko, Allyson Barlow, Kelly Cross, Joseph Mirabelli, Karin Jensen, Jeanne Sanders
article en

Abstract

Background: Formal and informal faculty peer mentoring relationships are important components of the development, growth, and trajectory of faculty. Yet this nuanced process of faculty peer mentorship remains an underexplored social phenomenon, especially regarding faculty transitions into engineering education research (EER) fields. Awards from the National Science Foundation like the NSF Research Initiation in Engineering Formations scaffold this process by providing an opportunity for engineering faculty to conduct funded EER projects with the guidance of an experienced mentor. Purpose/Hypothesis: Dynamics in faculty peer mentoring relationships influence their development. Here, we explore faculty peer mentorship in EER and define factors impacting the mentoring experience of faculty transitioning to conduct EER. We answer: How are engineering faculty participating in a specific NSF program trained and integrated into the EER community? Design/Method: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 grantees, including ten mentors and eight mentees. Data analysis followed an iterative thematic coding procedure to identify concepts that helped explain the mentorship experience of mentors and mentees. Results: We define aspects of faculty peer mentoring relationships: power dynamics, mentorship location, and team composition. These three elements of grantee teams emerged as themes which influenced, both positively and negatively, the experiences of grantees. Conclusions: By considering these factors when entering a formal peer mentoring relationship, prospective mentors and mentees preparing for small grant opportunities supporting the development of new faculty conducting EER can better anticipate challenges or needs in their mentoring relationships. These results can be extended to similarly structured mentoring contexts and inform research on other peer mentoring relationships in academic contexts.

Studies in Engineering EducationVol. 6(1)
Directorate for Engineering
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Mentoring and Academic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.