Outcomes After Damage Control Laparotomy Among White, American Indian, and Alaska Native Populations

BackgroundAmerican Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) populations have been shown to have severe health disparities, with increased 30-day mortality rates and surgical complications. They continue to represent a population that has the worst outcomes, however, still underrepresented within the medical literature. Further research into AIAN is critical to start to determine why these differences exist.MethodsA retrospective review of patients undergoing damage control laparotomies (DCLs) between 2015 and 2024 was conducted. Logistic regression was used to compare variables (age, race, gender, ASA, APACHE II, ICU admission, ventilation, number of operations, and time until abdominal closure).ResultsA total of 502 patients were included in the analysis. 10% of these were AIAN. The AIANs undergoing DCL had a mean age of 47.5 years, whereas White patients had a mean age of 62.1 years (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences in mortality rates. Non-mortality complications were equally distributed between the 2 groups. Logistic regression analysis identified age, APACHE II score, and procedure count as significant predictors of mortality.ConclusionsAmerican Indians are presenting at notably younger ages compared to their White counterparts (62 vs 48 years old). Despite comparable outcomes between the groups, this highlights a distinct age-related gap within our AIAN population, underscoring the necessity for heightened care in this specific patient demographic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Surgeon
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251329501
Primary Topic
Abdominal Surgery and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcomes After Damage Control Laparotomy Among White, American Indian, and Alaska Native Populations

Anthony J. Duncan, M. Williamson, Mentor Ahmeti, Conor S. Roche
The American Surgeon
Abdominal Surgery and Complications
article

Outcomes After Damage Control Laparotomy Among White, American Indian, and Alaska Native Populations

Anthony J. Duncan, M. Williamson, Mentor Ahmeti, Conor S. Roche
article en

Abstract

BackgroundAmerican Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) populations have been shown to have severe health disparities, with increased 30-day mortality rates and surgical complications. They continue to represent a population that has the worst outcomes, however, still underrepresented within the medical literature. Further research into AIAN is critical to start to determine why these differences exist.MethodsA retrospective review of patients undergoing damage control laparotomies (DCLs) between 2015 and 2024 was conducted. Logistic regression was used to compare variables (age, race, gender, ASA, APACHE II, ICU admission, ventilation, number of operations, and time until abdominal closure).ResultsA total of 502 patients were included in the analysis. 10% of these were AIAN. The AIANs undergoing DCL had a mean age of 47.5 years, whereas White patients had a mean age of 62.1 years (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences in mortality rates. Non-mortality complications were equally distributed between the 2 groups. Logistic regression analysis identified age, APACHE II score, and procedure count as significant predictors of mortality.ConclusionsAmerican Indians are presenting at notably younger ages compared to their White counterparts (62 vs 48 years old). Despite comparable outcomes between the groups, this highlights a distinct age-related gap within our AIAN population, underscoring the necessity for heightened care in this specific patient demographic.

The American SurgeonVol. 91(5)
University of North Dakota (US), Sanford Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Abdominal Surgery and Complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.