An Introspective Analysis of the Public Debates and International Responses towards Russian and Chinese Internet Policies

Digital Media has evolved as one of the leading opinion-shaping platforms in today’s modernized world wherein the masses have the freedom to share their viewpoints on a particular aspect irrespective of its alignment or opposition to the narratives supported, promoted, and most often sponsored by the states. Nevertheless, Russia and China have imposed severe restrictions on the freedom of speech of its citizens wherein they are not allowed to voice any perspective that goes against the policies of the state. China and Russia employ digital surveillance to keep a strict check on their citizens while their institutions overlook respect for human rights, human dignity, and principles of basic fundamental human rights in apprehending the culprits who violate domestic restrictions placed over them by the state. Western states, international organizations, and media channels have categorically highlighted the restrictions imposed by Russia and China on the freedom of speech whereas several cases have been registered against the Digital Authoritarianism of these states in the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). This research study is Qualitative and deductive in nature since it pertains to highlighting the specific conclusions and further orients toward general observations. This research study concludes that China and Russia have been pursuing a two-pronged multifaceted strategy to compete with the United States in the contemporary global and regional order; hence, such challenges will continue to advance in a multipolar world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Political Stability Archive
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63468/jpsa.3.1.34
Primary Topic
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Introspective Analysis of the Public Debates and International Responses towards Russian and Chinese Internet Policies

Hassam Ahmed Siddiqi, Muhammad Asim Saddiqi
Journal of Political Stability Archive
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
article

An Introspective Analysis of the Public Debates and International Responses towards Russian and Chinese Internet Policies

Hassam Ahmed Siddiqi, Muhammad Asim Saddiqi
article en

Abstract

Digital Media has evolved as one of the leading opinion-shaping platforms in today’s modernized world wherein the masses have the freedom to share their viewpoints on a particular aspect irrespective of its alignment or opposition to the narratives supported, promoted, and most often sponsored by the states. Nevertheless, Russia and China have imposed severe restrictions on the freedom of speech of its citizens wherein they are not allowed to voice any perspective that goes against the policies of the state. China and Russia employ digital surveillance to keep a strict check on their citizens while their institutions overlook respect for human rights, human dignity, and principles of basic fundamental human rights in apprehending the culprits who violate domestic restrictions placed over them by the state. Western states, international organizations, and media channels have categorically highlighted the restrictions imposed by Russia and China on the freedom of speech whereas several cases have been registered against the Digital Authoritarianism of these states in the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). This research study is Qualitative and deductive in nature since it pertains to highlighting the specific conclusions and further orients toward general observations. This research study concludes that China and Russia have been pursuing a two-pronged multifaceted strategy to compete with the United States in the contemporary global and regional order; hence, such challenges will continue to advance in a multipolar world.

Journal of Political Stability ArchiveVol. 3(1)
International Islamic University, Islamabad (PK), National University of Modern Languages (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.