The Influence of Art Activities on the Creativity of Junior Schoolchildren

Introduction. There is a consensus among practitioners teaching art to children that the very process of art education develops children’s creativity. However, in scientific psychology, there is no consensus on the advantages of children being involved in art, as evaluated by the generally accepted criteria for measuring creativity. The purpose of the study is to identify differences in creativity indicators in children involved and not involved in art, as well as the characteristics of creativity in different types of art. Materials and Methods. Our purpose was to clarify in which types of art study the indicators of creativity are higher. The Torrance Test of Creative Thinking was used to assess creativity. The sample comprised 312 children with an average age of 9.4 years. Participants were divided into three subgroups: children engaged in music, drawing, or dance; and children not engaged in any art forms. The study was conducted at supplementary education institutions and secondary schools focusing on children with at least two years of experience in their chosen art form to ensure developed skills. Results. Results showed that children participating in art programs displayed significantly higher levels of creativity, particularly in terms of detail, originality, and abstract thinking, compared to children without such involvement. However, the scores for originality and fluency were lower for the children involved in the arts. There were differences in the intensity of creativity indicators between the different types of art. Children engaged in art showed higher scores on the creativity scales associated with non-verbal intelligence. Those not involved in art were more creative in expressing ideas - verbal intelligence. Discussion and Conclusion. The results obtained by the authors contribute to the development of problems of creativity of children involved in art. The findings of this article are of practical importance for teachers of music and art schools, psychologists and teachers in the field of educational psychology and art.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Integration of Education
Published
2025-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.029.202501.186-199
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Influence of Art Activities on the Creativity of Junior Schoolchildren

Alexandra G. Dolgikh, Daria Bukhalenkova, T.A. Chernikova, Elena Chichinina et al.
Integration of Education
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
article

The Influence of Art Activities on the Creativity of Junior Schoolchildren

Alexandra G. Dolgikh, Daria Bukhalenkova, T.A. Chernikova, Elena Chichinina, Larisa Bayanova, Vera P. Ulyanova, Leysyan R. Logacheva
article en

Abstract

Introduction. There is a consensus among practitioners teaching art to children that the very process of art education develops children’s creativity. However, in scientific psychology, there is no consensus on the advantages of children being involved in art, as evaluated by the generally accepted criteria for measuring creativity. The purpose of the study is to identify differences in creativity indicators in children involved and not involved in art, as well as the characteristics of creativity in different types of art. Materials and Methods. Our purpose was to clarify in which types of art study the indicators of creativity are higher. The Torrance Test of Creative Thinking was used to assess creativity. The sample comprised 312 children with an average age of 9.4 years. Participants were divided into three subgroups: children engaged in music, drawing, or dance; and children not engaged in any art forms. The study was conducted at supplementary education institutions and secondary schools focusing on children with at least two years of experience in their chosen art form to ensure developed skills. Results. Results showed that children participating in art programs displayed significantly higher levels of creativity, particularly in terms of detail, originality, and abstract thinking, compared to children without such involvement. However, the scores for originality and fluency were lower for the children involved in the arts. There were differences in the intensity of creativity indicators between the different types of art. Children engaged in art showed higher scores on the creativity scales associated with non-verbal intelligence. Those not involved in art were more creative in expressing ideas - verbal intelligence. Discussion and Conclusion. The results obtained by the authors contribute to the development of problems of creativity of children involved in art. The findings of this article are of practical importance for teachers of music and art schools, psychologists and teachers in the field of educational psychology and art.

Integration of EducationVol. 29(1)
University of Science and Technology (YE), Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), Moscow State University (TJ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.