Federated and Centralized Machine Learning for Cell Segmentation: A Comparative Analysis

The automatic segmentation of cell images plays a critical role in medicine and biology, as it enables faster and more accurate analysis and diagnosis. Traditional machine learning faces challenges since it requires transferring sensitive data from laboratories to the cloud, with possible risks and limitations due to patients’ privacy, data-sharing regulations, or laboratory privacy guidelines. Federated learning addresses data-sharing issues by introducing a decentralized approach that removes the need for laboratories’ data sharing. The learning task is divided among the participating clients, with each training a global model situated on the cloud with its local dataset. This guarantees privacy by only transmitting updated model weights to the cloud. In this study, the centralized learning approach for cell segmentation is compared with the federated one, demonstrating that they achieve similar performances. Stemming from a benchmarking of available cell segmentation models, Cellpose, having shown better recall and precision (F1=0.84) than U-Net (F1=0.50) and StarDist (F1=0.12), was used as the baseline for a federated learning testbench implementation. The results show that both binary segmentation and multi-class segmentation metrics remain high when employing both the centralized solution (F1=0.86) and the federated solution (F12clients=0.86). These results were also stable across an increasing number of clients and a reduced number of local data samples (F14clients=0.87, F116clients=0.86), proving the effectiveness of central aggregation on the cloud of locally trained models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14071254
Primary Topic
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Federated and Centralized Machine Learning for Cell Segmentation: A Comparative Analysis

Sara Raggiunto, Alberto Belli, Marco Esposito, Paola Pierleoni et al.
Electronics
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
article

Federated and Centralized Machine Learning for Cell Segmentation: A Comparative Analysis

Sara Raggiunto, Alberto Belli, Marco Esposito, Paola Pierleoni, Sara Bruschi
article en

Abstract

The automatic segmentation of cell images plays a critical role in medicine and biology, as it enables faster and more accurate analysis and diagnosis. Traditional machine learning faces challenges since it requires transferring sensitive data from laboratories to the cloud, with possible risks and limitations due to patients’ privacy, data-sharing regulations, or laboratory privacy guidelines. Federated learning addresses data-sharing issues by introducing a decentralized approach that removes the need for laboratories’ data sharing. The learning task is divided among the participating clients, with each training a global model situated on the cloud with its local dataset. This guarantees privacy by only transmitting updated model weights to the cloud. In this study, the centralized learning approach for cell segmentation is compared with the federated one, demonstrating that they achieve similar performances. Stemming from a benchmarking of available cell segmentation models, Cellpose, having shown better recall and precision (F1=0.84) than U-Net (F1=0.50) and StarDist (F1=0.12), was used as the baseline for a federated learning testbench implementation. The results show that both binary segmentation and multi-class segmentation metrics remain high when employing both the centralized solution (F1=0.86) and the federated solution (F12clients=0.86). These results were also stable across an increasing number of clients and a reduced number of local data samples (F14clients=0.87, F116clients=0.86), proving the effectiveness of central aggregation on the cloud of locally trained models.

ElectronicsVol. 14(7)
Marche Polytechnic University (IT), Consorzio Nazionale Interuniversitario per le Telecomunicazioni (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Federated and Centralized Machine Learning for Cell Segmentation: A Comparative Analysis — Sara Raggiunto, Alberto Belli, et al. · Electronics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS