Challenges Faced by Teachers and Students in Teaching-Learning Reaction Mechanism

This study explores teachers’ and students’ difficulties while teaching and learning chemical reaction mechanisms. It included a sample of forty students and four teachers. It was carried out across two of the constituent campuses of TU. Likert scale statements were used in the quantitative methodology employed for the study to measure the difficulties teaching and learning reaction mechanisms. In-depth interviews and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with ten students and two purposefully chosen teachers also provided qualitative insights. The results show that students have difficulty in learning inductance, polar covalent bonds, SN1 and SN2 reactions, and homolytic and heterolytic bond fission. Similarly, educators face difficulties restricting pupils’ insufficient basic comprehension in modulation and visualization. The use of 3D simulation and modulation can improve understanding of reaction processes. The highlighted areas of this study need intervention to enhance teaching and learning of chemical reaction mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Quarterly
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3126/jeqtu.v5i1.76744
Primary Topic
Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges Faced by Teachers and Students in Teaching-Learning Reaction Mechanism

Krishna Maya Devkota, Narendra Pratapsingh Budhathoki
Education Quarterly
Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
article

Challenges Faced by Teachers and Students in Teaching-Learning Reaction Mechanism

Krishna Maya Devkota, Narendra Pratapsingh Budhathoki
article en

Abstract

This study explores teachers’ and students’ difficulties while teaching and learning chemical reaction mechanisms. It included a sample of forty students and four teachers. It was carried out across two of the constituent campuses of TU. Likert scale statements were used in the quantitative methodology employed for the study to measure the difficulties teaching and learning reaction mechanisms. In-depth interviews and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with ten students and two purposefully chosen teachers also provided qualitative insights. The results show that students have difficulty in learning inductance, polar covalent bonds, SN1 and SN2 reactions, and homolytic and heterolytic bond fission. Similarly, educators face difficulties restricting pupils’ insufficient basic comprehension in modulation and visualization. The use of 3D simulation and modulation can improve understanding of reaction processes. The highlighted areas of this study need intervention to enhance teaching and learning of chemical reaction mechanisms.

Education QuarterlyVol. 5(1)
Tribhuvan University (NP), Centre for Multi-disciplinary Development Research (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Challenges Faced by Teachers and Students in Teaching-Learning Reaction Mechanism — Krishna Maya Devkota, Narendra Pratapsingh Budhathoki · Education Quarterly (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS