Will the IMF Survive to 100?

ABSTRACT After almost 80 years of the IMF’s existence, the distribution of influence in key decisions is still much as it was at the organization’s founding in 1945, during the era of Western colonialism - still mostly in the hands of a small set of high-income nation. It is as though the emerging “multipolarity” of the world order had not taken place. This essay sets out the imbalance between the relative “weight” of a country (or set of countries) in the world economy and the relative weight in Fund governance. After explaining the quota system and other determinants of influence (including occupancy of positions) and the history of failed attempts to change the distribution of influence, the essay outlines several measures of incremental reform which would not challenge the US, European, and Japanese grip on institution but still improve the way it works in practice and also benefit the smaller and poorer member countries in particular. However, without more radical shifts in the distribution of influence, the answer to our title question is, probably not.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brazilian Journal of Political Economy
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572025-3742
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Will the IMF Survive to 100?

Paulo Nogueira Batista, Robert Wade
Brazilian Journal of Political Economy
International Development and Aid
article

Will the IMF Survive to 100?

Paulo Nogueira Batista, Robert Wade
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT After almost 80 years of the IMF’s existence, the distribution of influence in key decisions is still much as it was at the organization’s founding in 1945, during the era of Western colonialism - still mostly in the hands of a small set of high-income nation. It is as though the emerging “multipolarity” of the world order had not taken place. This essay sets out the imbalance between the relative “weight” of a country (or set of countries) in the world economy and the relative weight in Fund governance. After explaining the quota system and other determinants of influence (including occupancy of positions) and the history of failed attempts to change the distribution of influence, the essay outlines several measures of incremental reform which would not challenge the US, European, and Japanese grip on institution but still improve the way it works in practice and also benefit the smaller and poorer member countries in particular. However, without more radical shifts in the distribution of influence, the answer to our title question is, probably not.

Brazilian Journal of Political EconomyVol. 45(2)
Fundação Getulio Vargas (BR), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
International Development and Aid
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.