Hybrid peer-reviewed journals and publishing model: Bias or impartiality in editorial policy
In recent years, there has been a significant increase in scientific productivity—an increased number of published original articles, reviews, short communications, case reports, and letters to the editor. In this regard, there is a large number of peer-reviewed journals in all fields of scientific knowledge, including in the field of biomedical sciences. Many studies indicate the existence of so-called journal editorial board bias and acknowledge the difficulty of eliminating it. We present our brief opinion on an important topic such as how publishing policy in some peer-reviewed journals leads to feelings of bias and inequality among authors and how to address this.
Authors
- Magdalena Baymakova (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2631-0563)
- Bachir Khezzani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3268-1325)
- Ilia Tsachev (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3207-7603)
- Jadranka Nikolić (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0752-8708)
- Mile Bosilkovski (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0182-4741)
- Marija Dimzova (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1799-8079)
Institutions
- University of Mostar (BA)
- Trakia University (BG)
- Military Medical Academy (BG)
- Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje (MK)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Pharmacia
- Published
- 2025-03-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.72.e140149
- Primary Topic
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00