Experimental Comparison of a Three- and Five-Phase Squirrel Cage Induction Machine

A three-phase (IM3) and a five-phase (IM5) squirrel cage induction machine are compared as high-efficient inverter-fed motors in variable-speed drive applications. The design of the five-phase machine is based on an IE3 three-phase totally-enclosed, fan-cooled standard induction motor with 15 kW nominal power at 1476 rpm and 400 V. The five-phase induction machine complies with the same thermal, geometrical, electrical and mechanical constraints for a fair comparison. IM3 and IM5 are measured and compared at no-load, short-circuit and rated operation. A 3<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">rd</sup> harmonic voltage injection is only possible for IM5. The 3<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">rd</sup> harmonic voltage amplitude and phase angle are varied and measured to determine the loss minimum combination (efficiency improvement by 0.15% points). IM5 achieves a rated efficiency of 93.21 %, compared to 92.64% of IM3.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23919/icems60997.2024.10920974
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Electric Motor Design and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental Comparison of a Three- and Five-Phase Squirrel Cage Induction Machine

Yves Burkhardt, Andreas Binder, Alexander Möller
1 citations
Electric Motor Design and Analysis
0.21
article

Experimental Comparison of a Three- and Five-Phase Squirrel Cage Induction Machine

Yves Burkhardt, Andreas Binder, Alexander Möller
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A three-phase (IM3) and a five-phase (IM5) squirrel cage induction machine are compared as high-efficient inverter-fed motors in variable-speed drive applications. The design of the five-phase machine is based on an IE3 three-phase totally-enclosed, fan-cooled standard induction motor with 15 kW nominal power at 1476 rpm and 400 V. The five-phase induction machine complies with the same thermal, geometrical, electrical and mechanical constraints for a fair comparison. IM3 and IM5 are measured and compared at no-load, short-circuit and rated operation. A 3<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">rd</sup> harmonic voltage injection is only possible for IM5. The 3<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">rd</sup> harmonic voltage amplitude and phase angle are varied and measured to determine the loss minimum combination (efficiency improvement by 0.15% points). IM5 achieves a rated efficiency of 93.21 %, compared to 92.64% of IM3.

Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Electric Motor Design and Analysis
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.