A Novel Cournot Model of Electricity Market Considering Retailers' Strategic Behaviors

The recent electricity market reforms in China have led to a shift from supply-side competition to a more balanced market, with increased involvement from demand-side entities such as retailers, large consumers, and load aggregators. In this new context, both supply and demand sides' strategic behaviors will influence pricing, as opposed to the traditional model where the demand-side passively accepted prices. This study introduces a novel Cournot model that considers the strategic behaviors of retailers bidding on purchase budgets, thus reflecting their monopsony power. This model addresses the limitations of conventional approaches by integrating strategic interactions from both supply and demand sides, which are crucial in the evolving electricity market landscape. The model is solved using the nonlinear complementarity method, and numerical simulations demonstrate its effectiveness. The key findings indicate that retailers can lower market prices and increase profits by adjusting their budgets, affecting generator monopoly power and causing a shift in social welfare distribution. The research offers important insights for market regulators and enhances understanding of the interactions of competitive market participants in both supply and demand sides.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/appeec61255.2024.10922675
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Energy Efficiency and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.10

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Novel Cournot Model of Electricity Market Considering Retailers' Strategic Behaviors

Kexin Zhu, Jingjie Ma, Xian Wang, Shaohua Zhang
1 citations
Energy Efficiency and Management
0.10
article

A Novel Cournot Model of Electricity Market Considering Retailers' Strategic Behaviors

Kexin Zhu, Jingjie Ma, Xian Wang, Shaohua Zhang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The recent electricity market reforms in China have led to a shift from supply-side competition to a more balanced market, with increased involvement from demand-side entities such as retailers, large consumers, and load aggregators. In this new context, both supply and demand sides' strategic behaviors will influence pricing, as opposed to the traditional model where the demand-side passively accepted prices. This study introduces a novel Cournot model that considers the strategic behaviors of retailers bidding on purchase budgets, thus reflecting their monopsony power. This model addresses the limitations of conventional approaches by integrating strategic interactions from both supply and demand sides, which are crucial in the evolving electricity market landscape. The model is solved using the nonlinear complementarity method, and numerical simulations demonstrate its effectiveness. The key findings indicate that retailers can lower market prices and increase profits by adjusting their budgets, affecting generator monopoly power and causing a shift in social welfare distribution. The research offers important insights for market regulators and enhances understanding of the interactions of competitive market participants in both supply and demand sides.

Shanghai University (CN), Shanghai Institute of Technology (CN)
Shanghai Institute of Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Energy Efficiency and Management
0.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Novel Cournot Model of Electricity Market Considering Retailers' Strategic Behaviors — Kexin Zhu, Jingjie Ma, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS