Comparative Analysis of Encoder-Based and Decoder-Based Architectures for Automatic Conspiracy Theory Identification

This study evaluates the performance of encoder-based and decoder-based architectures for the Automatic Con-spiracy Theory Identification (ACTI) task, focusing on Subtask A, which involves detecting conspiratorial content in Telegram posts. I compared RoBERTa-based encoder models and OpenAI GPT-2 decoder models; both fine-tuned with uniform hyperparameters. My encoder-only model achieved an Fl-score of 0.8211, while the decoder-only model reached 0.7464, both significantly outperforming the Kaggle baseline (0.5107) but falling short of the EVALITA winners' score of 0.8572. The encoder model showed stronger performance in identifying conspiratorial content with fewer false positives, whereas the decoder model struggled with an increased number of false negatives. The results underscore the encoder-based model's effectiveness in this context and contribute to understanding the strengths and limitations of these architectures for conspiracy theory detection

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icccit62592.2025.10927920
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Encoder-Based and Decoder-Based Architectures for Automatic Conspiracy Theory Identification

K. K. Gupta
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Comparative Analysis of Encoder-Based and Decoder-Based Architectures for Automatic Conspiracy Theory Identification

K. K. Gupta
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the performance of encoder-based and decoder-based architectures for the Automatic Con-spiracy Theory Identification (ACTI) task, focusing on Subtask A, which involves detecting conspiratorial content in Telegram posts. I compared RoBERTa-based encoder models and OpenAI GPT-2 decoder models; both fine-tuned with uniform hyperparameters. My encoder-only model achieved an Fl-score of 0.8211, while the decoder-only model reached 0.7464, both significantly outperforming the Kaggle baseline (0.5107) but falling short of the EVALITA winners' score of 0.8572. The encoder model showed stronger performance in identifying conspiratorial content with fewer false positives, whereas the decoder model struggled with an increased number of false negatives. The results underscore the encoder-based model's effectiveness in this context and contribute to understanding the strengths and limitations of these architectures for conspiracy theory detection

Rajasthan Police Academy (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of Encoder-Based and Decoder-Based Architectures for Automatic Conspiracy Theory Identification — K. K. Gupta · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS