Mathematical Capabilities of LLMs

Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to solve mathematical problems well, but little has been investigated. In this research, we evaluate five leading LLMs — (Gemini, Claude, Mistral, ChatGPT, and Llama — on a set of 50 mathematical problems that cover calculus, algebra, geometry, number theory, and probability. Finally, the study evaluates the accuracy of their solutions and gives the ability to assess their intermediate steps correctly. I created a primary dataset for comparison of the LLM performances and ranked the models according to how well they were able to solve those problems. It illustrates the shortcomings of present LLMs at reasoning and solving for mathematics and suggests what needs to be rectified in the LLMs. Future research will further refine this dataset and monitor the progression of LLM capabilities in solving more complex mathematical problems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icccit62592.2025.10928013
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mathematical Capabilities of LLMs

Rahul Thakur, Ramesh Chandra Poonia
1 citations
Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
1.50
article

Mathematical Capabilities of LLMs

Rahul Thakur, Ramesh Chandra Poonia
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to solve mathematical problems well, but little has been investigated. In this research, we evaluate five leading LLMs — (Gemini, Claude, Mistral, ChatGPT, and Llama — on a set of 50 mathematical problems that cover calculus, algebra, geometry, number theory, and probability. Finally, the study evaluates the accuracy of their solutions and gives the ability to assess their intermediate steps correctly. I created a primary dataset for comparison of the LLM performances and ranked the models according to how well they were able to solve those problems. It illustrates the shortcomings of present LLMs at reasoning and solving for mathematics and suggests what needs to be rectified in the LLMs. Future research will further refine this dataset and monitor the progression of LLM capabilities in solving more complex mathematical problems.

Christ University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
1.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.