Overlapping Cortical Substrate of Biomechanical Control and Subjective Agency

Every movement requires the nervous system to solve a complex biomechanical control problem, but this process is mostly veiled from one's conscious awareness. Simultaneously, we also have conscious experience of controlling our movements-our sense of agency (SoA). Whether SoA corresponds to those neural representations that implement actual neuromuscular control is an open question with ethical, medical, and legal implications. If SoA is the conscious experience of control, this predicts that SoA can be decoded from the same brain structures that implement the so-called "inverse dynamics" computations for planning movement. We correlated human (male and female) fMRI measurements during hand movements with the internal representations of a deep neural network (DNN) performing the same hand control task in a biomechanical simulation-revealing detailed cortical encodings of sensorimotor states, idiosyncratic to each subject. We then manipulated SoA by usurping control of participants' muscles via electrical stimulation, and found that the same voxels which were best explained by modeled inverse dynamics representations-which, strikingly, were located in canonically visual areas-also predicted SoA. Importantly, model-brain correspondences and robust SoA decoding could both be achieved within single subjects, enabling relationships between motor representations and awareness to be studied at the level of the individual.<b>Significance Statement</b> The inherent complexity of biomechanical control problems is belied by the seeming simplicity of directing movements in our subjective experience. This aspect of our experience suggests we have limited conscious access to the neural and mental representations involved in controlling the body - but of which of the many possible representations are we, in fact, aware? Understanding which motor control representations percolate into awareness has taken on increasing importance as emerging neural interface technologies push the boundaries of human autonomy. In our study, we leverage machine learning models that have learned to control simulated bodies to localize biomechanical control representations in the brain. Then, we show that these brain regions predict perceived agency over the musculature during functional electrical stimulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1673-24.2025
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Overlapping Cortical Substrate of Biomechanical Control and Subjective Agency

Romain Nith, A. Chao, Howard C. Nusbaum, John P. Veillette et al.
1 citations
Journal of Neuroscience
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
1.43
article

Overlapping Cortical Substrate of Biomechanical Control and Subjective Agency

Romain Nith, A. Chao, Howard C. Nusbaum, John P. Veillette, Pedro Lopes
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Every movement requires the nervous system to solve a complex biomechanical control problem, but this process is mostly veiled from one's conscious awareness. Simultaneously, we also have conscious experience of controlling our movements-our sense of agency (SoA). Whether SoA corresponds to those neural representations that implement actual neuromuscular control is an open question with ethical, medical, and legal implications. If SoA is the conscious experience of control, this predicts that SoA can be decoded from the same brain structures that implement the so-called "inverse dynamics" computations for planning movement. We correlated human (male and female) fMRI measurements during hand movements with the internal representations of a deep neural network (DNN) performing the same hand control task in a biomechanical simulation-revealing detailed cortical encodings of sensorimotor states, idiosyncratic to each subject. We then manipulated SoA by usurping control of participants' muscles via electrical stimulation, and found that the same voxels which were best explained by modeled inverse dynamics representations-which, strikingly, were located in canonically visual areas-also predicted SoA. Importantly, model-brain correspondences and robust SoA decoding could both be achieved within single subjects, enabling relationships between motor representations and awareness to be studied at the level of the individual.<b>Significance Statement</b> The inherent complexity of biomechanical control problems is belied by the seeming simplicity of directing movements in our subjective experience. This aspect of our experience suggests we have limited conscious access to the neural and mental representations involved in controlling the body - but of which of the many possible representations are we, in fact, aware? Understanding which motor control representations percolate into awareness has taken on increasing importance as emerging neural interface technologies push the boundaries of human autonomy. In our study, we leverage machine learning models that have learned to control simulated bodies to localize biomechanical control representations in the brain. Then, we show that these brain regions predict perceived agency over the musculature during functional electrical stimulation.

Journal of NeuroscienceVol. 45(18)
University of Illinois Chicago (US), University of Chicago (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.