Pro-poor transport subsidies: More user welfare and faster travel

A previous study has shown limited success of traditional fare discount subsidies in promoting public transport usage among low-income populations in Bogotá, Colombia. This paper evaluates the differential impacts of a novel demand-side subsidy, in the form of public transport vouchers, on user welfare and travel behavior. The study employs a large-scale randomized controlled trial involving 1607 frequent users of Bogotá’s Integrated Public Transport System, half of whom received monthly travel vouchers on their personalized travel cards. The other half acted as a control group. A discrete choice random utility model is utilized to analyze weekly travel patterns and estimate changes in welfare in terms of consumer surplus by gender and travel purpose, based on a panel database that has information on multiple travel choices over 6 months. The results indicate a significant increase in the utility of the BRT and regular bus services for voucher recipients, leading to increased BRT usage, decreased regular bus usage, and travel time savings. The study also finds that travel vouchers notably enhance user welfare, especially for female participants and non-work-related trips, suggesting these trip purposes generate greater user benefits. The findings highlight the potential of voucher-based subsidies to induce behavioral changes and improve welfare, particularly for groups that typically depend more on public transport services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104454
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pro-poor transport subsidies: More user welfare and faster travel

Jorge Luis Ochoa, Luis A. Guzmán, Santiago Gómez Cardona, Iván Sarmiento
2 citations
Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice
Urban Transport and Accessibility
4.35
article

Pro-poor transport subsidies: More user welfare and faster travel

Jorge Luis Ochoa, Luis A. Guzmán, Santiago Gómez Cardona, Iván Sarmiento
article en
2 citations

Abstract

A previous study has shown limited success of traditional fare discount subsidies in promoting public transport usage among low-income populations in Bogotá, Colombia. This paper evaluates the differential impacts of a novel demand-side subsidy, in the form of public transport vouchers, on user welfare and travel behavior. The study employs a large-scale randomized controlled trial involving 1607 frequent users of Bogotá’s Integrated Public Transport System, half of whom received monthly travel vouchers on their personalized travel cards. The other half acted as a control group. A discrete choice random utility model is utilized to analyze weekly travel patterns and estimate changes in welfare in terms of consumer surplus by gender and travel purpose, based on a panel database that has information on multiple travel choices over 6 months. The results indicate a significant increase in the utility of the BRT and regular bus services for voucher recipients, leading to increased BRT usage, decreased regular bus usage, and travel time savings. The study also finds that travel vouchers notably enhance user welfare, especially for female participants and non-work-related trips, suggesting these trip purposes generate greater user benefits. The findings highlight the potential of voucher-based subsidies to induce behavioral changes and improve welfare, particularly for groups that typically depend more on public transport services.

Transportation Research Part A Policy and PracticeVol. 195
Universidad de Los Andes (CO), Maastricht University (NL)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
4.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.