Cable Correction Model for HF Resistance Standards Comparisons

In this article, we present a model that allows for significantly improving the impedance accuracy of calculable resistance standards. The proposed model extends the correction factor applied to the calculated four-terminal-pair impedance from the connector parts of the standard to the complete measurement circuit concerned by the applied voltage and current, respectively. In particular, we consider the cables and connectors contribution of the impedance bridge electronics. The model has been validated by performing: 1:1 and 0.1:1 impedance comparisons by means of two different typologies of calculable resistance standards. For the measurements, we relied on the accuracy of a digital bridge, which exploits the signals of two Josephson arbitrary waveform synthesizers (JAWSs). The frequency dependence of these new resistors has been analyzed over a range between 1 and 80 kHz.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2025.3553977
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Power Line Communications and Noise
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cable Correction Model for HF Resistance Standards Comparisons

F. Overney, A Eichenberger, Marco Agustoni, Jan Kučera
1 citations
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Power Line Communications and Noise
0.73
article

Cable Correction Model for HF Resistance Standards Comparisons

F. Overney, A Eichenberger, Marco Agustoni, Jan Kučera
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this article, we present a model that allows for significantly improving the impedance accuracy of calculable resistance standards. The proposed model extends the correction factor applied to the calculated four-terminal-pair impedance from the connector parts of the standard to the complete measurement circuit concerned by the applied voltage and current, respectively. In particular, we consider the cables and connectors contribution of the impedance bridge electronics. The model has been validated by performing: 1:1 and 0.1:1 impedance comparisons by means of two different typologies of calculable resistance standards. For the measurements, we relied on the accuracy of a digital bridge, which exploits the signals of two Josephson arbitrary waveform synthesizers (JAWSs). The frequency dependence of these new resistors has been analyzed over a range between 1 and 80 kHz.

IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and MeasurementVol. 74
Swiss Federal Institute of Metrology (CH), Český metrologický institut (CZ)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Power Line Communications and Noise
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cable Correction Model for HF Resistance Standards Comparisons — F. Overney, A Eichenberger, et al. · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS