Quality of Life and Mental Health in COVID-ARDS Survivors After V-V ECMO Support: Results from the Freiburg ECMO Outcome Study (FEOS)

<b>Introduction</b>: Desirable outcome after venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is frequently defined by survival. However, quality of life (QoL) and mental health status may take precedence over mere survival, from a patient-centered perspective. We aimed to evaluate QoL and mental health status in survivors after V-V ECMO for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related ARDS, hypothesizing a similar QoL comparable to the general population. <b>Methods</b>: All patients supported with venovenous ECMO for COVID-19-related ARDS between 01/2020 and 03/2022 in our center were included. Survivors were invited to participate in a follow-up interview assessing QoL, anxiety, and depression one year after hospital discharge. Primary endpoint was the quality of life, measured by the SF-36 questionnaire, with results compared to data from the DEGS1 study (German normative population). <b>Results</b>: During the study period, 97 patients received venovenous ECMO for COVID-19 ARDS at our ICU. Overall, 43/97 (44.3%) survived, and 21/97 (21.6%) completed the SF-36 questionnaire. The median follow-up duration was 1.7 years. Patients who completed the SF-36 were significantly younger than those who did not (48.7 vs. 55.6 years, <i>p</i> = 0.012); other patient characteristics and ECMO parameters were similar between those with and without questionnaire. Anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder were detected in 33%, 14%, and 29% of patients, respectively. Compared to the German normative population, ECMO survivors had significantly lower QoL (mean 77.2 vs. 61.0, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: QoL and mental health status after venovenous ECMO for ARDS was significantly lower compared to the normative population. These findings highlight the importance of further research and comprehensive follow-up care for ECMO survivors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14072206
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality of Life and Mental Health in COVID-ARDS Survivors After V-V ECMO Support: Results from the Freiburg ECMO Outcome Study (FEOS)

Viviane Zotzmann, Felix A. Rottmann, Tobias Wengenmayer, Dawid L. Staudacher et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
0.67
article

Quality of Life and Mental Health in COVID-ARDS Survivors After V-V ECMO Support: Results from the Freiburg ECMO Outcome Study (FEOS)

Viviane Zotzmann, Felix A. Rottmann, Tobias Wengenmayer, Dawid L. Staudacher, Alexander Supady, Xavier Bemtgen, Markus Jäckel, Michael R. Felder, Philipp Diehl
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Introduction</b>: Desirable outcome after venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is frequently defined by survival. However, quality of life (QoL) and mental health status may take precedence over mere survival, from a patient-centered perspective. We aimed to evaluate QoL and mental health status in survivors after V-V ECMO for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related ARDS, hypothesizing a similar QoL comparable to the general population. <b>Methods</b>: All patients supported with venovenous ECMO for COVID-19-related ARDS between 01/2020 and 03/2022 in our center were included. Survivors were invited to participate in a follow-up interview assessing QoL, anxiety, and depression one year after hospital discharge. Primary endpoint was the quality of life, measured by the SF-36 questionnaire, with results compared to data from the DEGS1 study (German normative population). <b>Results</b>: During the study period, 97 patients received venovenous ECMO for COVID-19 ARDS at our ICU. Overall, 43/97 (44.3%) survived, and 21/97 (21.6%) completed the SF-36 questionnaire. The median follow-up duration was 1.7 years. Patients who completed the SF-36 were significantly younger than those who did not (48.7 vs. 55.6 years, <i>p</i> = 0.012); other patient characteristics and ECMO parameters were similar between those with and without questionnaire. Anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder were detected in 33%, 14%, and 29% of patients, respectively. Compared to the German normative population, ECMO survivors had significantly lower QoL (mean 77.2 vs. 61.0, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: QoL and mental health status after venovenous ECMO for ARDS was significantly lower compared to the normative population. These findings highlight the importance of further research and comprehensive follow-up care for ECMO survivors.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(7)
University of Freiburg (DE), University Medical Center Freiburg (DE), Ortenau Klinikum (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.