Practical In situ Calibration for Dose-area Product Meter in Interventional Fluoroscopy: Beam-area Method

The radiation dosimetry used to measure the ionizing radiation dose delivered during X-ray imaging procedures in planar radiography units, especially in fluoroscopy, is the dose-area product (DAP). DAP is used as the primary parameter for recording diagnostic reference levels, which are guidance values for optimizing patient radiation dose. DAP is reported by the system's DAP meter, which needs to be calibrated appropriately. This study evaluates the influence of dosimeters and field markers on the accuracy of DAP levels in the DAP meter <i>in situ</i> calibration method. The aim of this study is to recommend a combination of dosimeter types and field markers with the highest accuracy for the beam-area method. Two methods of DAP meter <i>in situ</i> calibration were compared: the tandem method with a reference DAP meter as the reference DA<i>P</i> value and the beam-area method using ion chamber dosimeters, solid-state dosimeters, as well as field markers from digital radiography (DR) and computed radiography. This method was applied to the DAP meter in the Allura XPER FD 20 angiography (Philips, Amsterdam, the Netherlands) unit. The results showed that the combination of ion chamber dosimeter and DR field markers at a distance of 55 cm produced the most accurate DA<i>P</i> values (lowest root mean square error value, 0.10). The recommended calibration method can be used to confirm the actual DA<i>P</i> value in X-ray imaging in a planar radiography unit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Physics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_172_24
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practical In situ Calibration for Dose-area Product Meter in Interventional Fluoroscopy: Beam-area Method

Hanendya Disha Randy Raharja, Lukmanda Evan Lubis, Rabha W. Ibrahim, Fara Farisa Dhaifina
Journal of Medical Physics
Radiation Dose and Imaging
article

Practical In situ Calibration for Dose-area Product Meter in Interventional Fluoroscopy: Beam-area Method

Hanendya Disha Randy Raharja, Lukmanda Evan Lubis, Rabha W. Ibrahim, Fara Farisa Dhaifina
article en

Abstract

The radiation dosimetry used to measure the ionizing radiation dose delivered during X-ray imaging procedures in planar radiography units, especially in fluoroscopy, is the dose-area product (DAP). DAP is used as the primary parameter for recording diagnostic reference levels, which are guidance values for optimizing patient radiation dose. DAP is reported by the system's DAP meter, which needs to be calibrated appropriately. This study evaluates the influence of dosimeters and field markers on the accuracy of DAP levels in the DAP meter <i>in situ</i> calibration method. The aim of this study is to recommend a combination of dosimeter types and field markers with the highest accuracy for the beam-area method. Two methods of DAP meter <i>in situ</i> calibration were compared: the tandem method with a reference DAP meter as the reference DA<i>P</i> value and the beam-area method using ion chamber dosimeters, solid-state dosimeters, as well as field markers from digital radiography (DR) and computed radiography. This method was applied to the DAP meter in the Allura XPER FD 20 angiography (Philips, Amsterdam, the Netherlands) unit. The results showed that the combination of ion chamber dosimeter and DR field markers at a distance of 55 cm produced the most accurate DA<i>P</i> values (lowest root mean square error value, 0.10). The recommended calibration method can be used to confirm the actual DA<i>P</i> value in X-ray imaging in a planar radiography unit.

Journal of Medical PhysicsVol. 50(1)
University of Indonesia (ID), Siloam Eye Hospital (KR)
International Atomic Energy Agency, Universitas Indonesia
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.