The Exhaustion Triangle: How Psychosocial Risks, Engagement, and Burnout Impact Workplace Well-Being

Employee burnout levels have risen due to teleworking, increased job demands, and the lack of clear boundaries between personal and professional life. This study evaluated burnout levels, occupational health (through the presence or absence of psychosocial risk factors), engagement, and well-being/job satisfaction in a sample of employees aged over 18 from varying sociodemographic backgrounds. Additionally, we sought to explore the relationships among these variables and their influence on workplace well-being. The sample comprised 112 employees aged 18 to 65 (of both genders). The instruments used included the Burnout Syndrome Scale (Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey -MBI-SS-), the DECORE multidimensional questionnaire, the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES), and the General Work Well-Being Questionnaire (qBLG). The results indicated that overall workplace well-being levels are high, while the presence of psychosocial risk factors and burnout levels are moderate to low. Most variables correlated with each other in the expected directions. Furthermore, job well-being was inversely predicted by cynicism and burnout and positively predicted by support, engagement, and control. This study highlights the importance of workplace well-being and occupational health. Our findings suggest the need for intervention programs that include strategies to motivate employees, improve the work environment, and enhance stress coping mechanisms, among other areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences
Published
2025-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15040408
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Exhaustion Triangle: How Psychosocial Risks, Engagement, and Burnout Impact Workplace Well-Being

Adelaida Ogallar, Raquel Lara Moreno, María Luisa Vázquez Pérez, Nancy Guzmán-Raya
1 citations
Behavioral Sciences
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
2.82
article

The Exhaustion Triangle: How Psychosocial Risks, Engagement, and Burnout Impact Workplace Well-Being

Adelaida Ogallar, Raquel Lara Moreno, María Luisa Vázquez Pérez, Nancy Guzmán-Raya
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Employee burnout levels have risen due to teleworking, increased job demands, and the lack of clear boundaries between personal and professional life. This study evaluated burnout levels, occupational health (through the presence or absence of psychosocial risk factors), engagement, and well-being/job satisfaction in a sample of employees aged over 18 from varying sociodemographic backgrounds. Additionally, we sought to explore the relationships among these variables and their influence on workplace well-being. The sample comprised 112 employees aged 18 to 65 (of both genders). The instruments used included the Burnout Syndrome Scale (Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey -MBI-SS-), the DECORE multidimensional questionnaire, the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES), and the General Work Well-Being Questionnaire (qBLG). The results indicated that overall workplace well-being levels are high, while the presence of psychosocial risk factors and burnout levels are moderate to low. Most variables correlated with each other in the expected directions. Furthermore, job well-being was inversely predicted by cynicism and burnout and positively predicted by support, engagement, and control. This study highlights the importance of workplace well-being and occupational health. Our findings suggest the need for intervention programs that include strategies to motivate employees, improve the work environment, and enhance stress coping mechanisms, among other areas.

Behavioral SciencesVol. 15(4)
Universidad de Granada (ES), Universidad de Jaén (ES)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.