A mixed-method approach to understand energy-related occupant behavior and everyday practices in multi-story residential buildings

• Uses a sequential mixed-method approach to study heating behavior and practices in low-energy households. • The quantitative analysis shows that heating seasons are individual for each household. • The qualitative analysis revealed that sharing energy-saving practices can foster energy efficiency. • Previous experience and social relations shape heating practices and behavior. • Underpins the importance of building manager support for successful feedback implementation. In recent decades, attention has increased to investigating energy-related occupant behavior and everyday practices to contribute to bridging buildings’ well-known energy performance gap. Understanding some of the mechanisms behind this gap, such as, the energy-related decisions and/or shared heating practices among occupants, could foster effective strategies for promoting energy efficiency. However, such mechanisms are not yet well identified, especially in residential contexts and low-energy buildings, where the relative impact of occupants’ behavior is predominant. Aiming to contribute to tackling this knowledge gap, this article presents the results of a sequential mixed-method approach, combining quantitative and qualitative methods to study the energy-related practices of six occupants in five households of a multi-story low-energy household block located in Denmark. The households are monitored with sensors measuring heating use, room temperature, and heating setpoint temperature, enabling to capture human-building interactions at a high resolution. The quantitative analyses (data analyses) showed substantial differences in heating behavior and practices and thermal comfort preferences across households and over the seasons (from 90 to 301 heating days a year). Nevertheless, the qualitative analysis (semi-structured interviews) indicates shared practices regarding the use of the feedback display installed in each dwelling. This suggests that despite individual differences in preferences and habits, households living in the same building still share heating practices. The findings underpin the importance of the building managers’ support and trust in improving feedback implementation and ensuring heating practices to support building energy efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy and Buildings
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115650
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A mixed-method approach to understand energy-related occupant behavior and everyday practices in multi-story residential buildings

Per Heiselberg, Kamilla Heimar Andersen, Daniel Leiria, Henrik Nellemose Knudsen et al.
1 citations
Energy and Buildings
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
1.01
article

A mixed-method approach to understand energy-related occupant behavior and everyday practices in multi-story residential buildings

Per Heiselberg, Kamilla Heimar Andersen, Daniel Leiria, Henrik Nellemose Knudsen, Anna Marzsal-Pomianowska, Anders Rhiger Hansen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Uses a sequential mixed-method approach to study heating behavior and practices in low-energy households. • The quantitative analysis shows that heating seasons are individual for each household. • The qualitative analysis revealed that sharing energy-saving practices can foster energy efficiency. • Previous experience and social relations shape heating practices and behavior. • Underpins the importance of building manager support for successful feedback implementation. In recent decades, attention has increased to investigating energy-related occupant behavior and everyday practices to contribute to bridging buildings’ well-known energy performance gap. Understanding some of the mechanisms behind this gap, such as, the energy-related decisions and/or shared heating practices among occupants, could foster effective strategies for promoting energy efficiency. However, such mechanisms are not yet well identified, especially in residential contexts and low-energy buildings, where the relative impact of occupants’ behavior is predominant. Aiming to contribute to tackling this knowledge gap, this article presents the results of a sequential mixed-method approach, combining quantitative and qualitative methods to study the energy-related practices of six occupants in five households of a multi-story low-energy household block located in Denmark. The households are monitored with sensors measuring heating use, room temperature, and heating setpoint temperature, enabling to capture human-building interactions at a high resolution. The quantitative analyses (data analyses) showed substantial differences in heating behavior and practices and thermal comfort preferences across households and over the seasons (from 90 to 301 heating days a year). Nevertheless, the qualitative analysis (semi-structured interviews) indicates shared practices regarding the use of the feedback display installed in each dwelling. This suggests that despite individual differences in preferences and habits, households living in the same building still share heating practices. The findings underpin the importance of the building managers’ support and trust in improving feedback implementation and ensuring heating practices to support building energy efficiency.

Energy and BuildingsVol. 337
SINTEF (NO), Aalborg University (DK)
European Commission, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.