Compensation, Beliefs in State Intervention, and Support for the Energy Transition

Transitioning away from carbon-intensive to renewable energy sources is one key lever through which countries can mitigate climate change. Governments have implemented interventionist policies that simultaneously seek to promote a transition to greener energy sources and shield producers and consumers from the costs of this change. We examine the impact of this enhanced role of the state on public opinion about environmental reforms. Using data from a survey containing multiple experiments fielded during the 2021 federal election in Germany, we show that policies of compensation that target households rather than firms and that have a progressive design increase support for electoral candidates who run on a pro-energy transition platform and for climate policy plans. We also show that beliefs in state intervention in the market have emerged as an important cleavage within the German mass public concerning environmental reforms because they shape assessments of the effectiveness and appropriateness of compensation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Political Studies
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140251328009
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Compensation, Beliefs in State Intervention, and Support for the Energy Transition

Kenneth F. Scheve, Isabela Mares, Christina Toenshoff
1 citations
Comparative Political Studies
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
0.36
article

Compensation, Beliefs in State Intervention, and Support for the Energy Transition

Kenneth F. Scheve, Isabela Mares, Christina Toenshoff
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Transitioning away from carbon-intensive to renewable energy sources is one key lever through which countries can mitigate climate change. Governments have implemented interventionist policies that simultaneously seek to promote a transition to greener energy sources and shield producers and consumers from the costs of this change. We examine the impact of this enhanced role of the state on public opinion about environmental reforms. Using data from a survey containing multiple experiments fielded during the 2021 federal election in Germany, we show that policies of compensation that target households rather than firms and that have a progressive design increase support for electoral candidates who run on a pro-energy transition platform and for climate policy plans. We also show that beliefs in state intervention in the market have emerged as an important cleavage within the German mass public concerning environmental reforms because they shape assessments of the effectiveness and appropriateness of compensation.

Comparative Political StudiesVol. 59(2)
Leiden University (NL), Yale University (US)
Yale University
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.