A randomised, parallel-group clinical trial comparing bedinvetmab to meloxicam for the management of canine osteoarthritis

Bedinvetmab (Librela<sup>®</sup>), a fully canine anti-nerve growth factor monoclonal antibody, was compared to the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) meloxicam in dogs for the management of osteoarthritis-related pain in a randomised, open-label, multicentre, parallel-group study. Subjects were recruited from general practices as client-owned dogs with appendicular osteoarthritis. Dogs were block randomised 1:1 to either daily oral meloxicam or bedinvetmab, administered subcutaneously once a month. The primary endpoint for efficacy was the change from baseline in the Canine Orthopaedic Index (COI) score. Linear mixed-effects models were used for statistical analysis conducted on a per-protocol and intent-to-treat basis. We hypothesised that bedinvetmab would demonstrate superior efficacy and safety compared to meloxicam; the number needed to harm (NNH) for meloxicam, relative to bedinvetmab, was calculated. Of the 190 screened dogs, 101 were randomised (bedinvetmab 52; meloxicam 49). Overall, both treatment groups showed a significant reduction in COI scores relative to baseline (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The bedinvetmab group experienced a larger mean reduction in COI scores, but this was not statistically significant. A significant effect of the visit was observed, with later visits showing a significantly greater reduction in COI compared to Visit 2 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The bedinvetmab group reported four (AEs), whilst the meloxicam group reported 17, with nine of those being gastrointestinal system disorders. Additionally, more dogs in the bedinvetmab group completed the study (<i>n</i> = 44) compared to those in the meloxicam group (<i>n</i> = 33). This is the first study to compare bedinvetmab to an NSAID for the management of osteoarthritis-related pain in dogs. The results suggest that both products are equally effective in managing OA pain, with efficacy improving over time for both treatments. Bedinvetmab was associated with fewer AEs. These data will aid clinicians and pet owners in choosing analgesic options for dogs with osteoarthritis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1502218
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A randomised, parallel-group clinical trial comparing bedinvetmab to meloxicam for the management of canine osteoarthritis

B. Duncan X. Lascelles, Ross Tulloch, Thomas W. Maddox, Kate Higgins et al.
6 citations
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
14.13
article

A randomised, parallel-group clinical trial comparing bedinvetmab to meloxicam for the management of canine osteoarthritis

B. Duncan X. Lascelles, Ross Tulloch, Thomas W. Maddox, Kate Higgins, Carrie A. Northcott, John Innes, Daniel Bell, April McVey, Mahala Welbourn, Veronika Horakova
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Bedinvetmab (Librela<sup>®</sup>), a fully canine anti-nerve growth factor monoclonal antibody, was compared to the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) meloxicam in dogs for the management of osteoarthritis-related pain in a randomised, open-label, multicentre, parallel-group study. Subjects were recruited from general practices as client-owned dogs with appendicular osteoarthritis. Dogs were block randomised 1:1 to either daily oral meloxicam or bedinvetmab, administered subcutaneously once a month. The primary endpoint for efficacy was the change from baseline in the Canine Orthopaedic Index (COI) score. Linear mixed-effects models were used for statistical analysis conducted on a per-protocol and intent-to-treat basis. We hypothesised that bedinvetmab would demonstrate superior efficacy and safety compared to meloxicam; the number needed to harm (NNH) for meloxicam, relative to bedinvetmab, was calculated. Of the 190 screened dogs, 101 were randomised (bedinvetmab 52; meloxicam 49). Overall, both treatment groups showed a significant reduction in COI scores relative to baseline (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The bedinvetmab group experienced a larger mean reduction in COI scores, but this was not statistically significant. A significant effect of the visit was observed, with later visits showing a significantly greater reduction in COI compared to Visit 2 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The bedinvetmab group reported four (AEs), whilst the meloxicam group reported 17, with nine of those being gastrointestinal system disorders. Additionally, more dogs in the bedinvetmab group completed the study (<i>n</i> = 44) compared to those in the meloxicam group (<i>n</i> = 33). This is the first study to compare bedinvetmab to an NSAID for the management of osteoarthritis-related pain in dogs. The results suggest that both products are equally effective in managing OA pain, with efficacy improving over time for both treatments. Bedinvetmab was associated with fewer AEs. These data will aid clinicians and pet owners in choosing analgesic options for dogs with osteoarthritis.

Frontiers in Veterinary ScienceVol. 12
North Carolina State University (US), University of Liverpool (GB), Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Sands (GB)
Zoetis
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
14.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.