Energy and Spectral Efficiency Analysis for UAV-to-UAV Communication in Dynamic Networks for Smart Cities

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are integral to the development of smart city infrastructures, enabling essential services such as real-time surveillance, urban traffic regulation, and cooperative environmental monitoring. UAV-to-UAV communication networks, despite their adaptability, have significant limits stemming from onboard battery constraints, inclement weather, and variable flight trajectories. This work presents a thorough examination of energy and spectral efficiency in UAV-to-UAV communication over four frequency bands: 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz, 28 GHz, and 60 GHz. Our MATLAB R2023a simulations include classical free-space path loss, Rayleigh/Rician fading, and real-time mobility profiles, accommodating varied heights (up to 500 m), flight velocities (reaching 15 m/s), and fluctuations in the path loss exponent. Low-frequency bands (e.g., 2.4 GHz) exhibit up to 50% reduced path loss compared to higher mmWave bands for distances exceeding several hundred meters. Energy efficiency (ηe) is evaluated by contrasting throughput with total power consumption, indicating that 2.4 GHz initiates at around 0.15 bits/Joule (decreasing to 0.02 bits/Joule after 10 s), whereas 28 GHz and 60 GHz demonstrate markedly worse ηe (as low as 10−3–10−4bits/Joule), resulting from increased path loss and oxygen absorption. Similarly, sub-6 GHz spectral efficiency can attain 4×10−12bps/Hz in near-line-of-sight scenarios, whereas 60 GHz lines encounter significant attenuation at distances above 200–300 m without sophisticated beamforming techniques. Polynomial-fitting methods indicate that the projected ηe diverges from actual performance by less than 5% after 10 s of flight, highlighting the feasibility of machine-learning-based techniques for real-time power regulation, beam steering, or multi-band switching. While mmWave UAV communication can provide significant capacity enhancements (100–500 MHz bandwidth), energy efficiency deteriorates markedly without meticulous flight planning or adaptive protocols. We thus advocate using multi-band radios, adaptive modulation, and trajectory optimisation to equilibrate power consumption, ensure connection stability, and meet high data-rate requirements in densely populated, dynamic urban settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Smart Cities
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities8020054
Citations
6
Primary Topic
UAV Applications and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
29.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy and Spectral Efficiency Analysis for UAV-to-UAV Communication in Dynamic Networks for Smart Cities

Ubong Ukommi, Sunday Ekpo, Mfonobong Uko, Unwana Ubong Iwok et al.
6 citations
Smart Cities
UAV Applications and Optimization
29.96
article

Energy and Spectral Efficiency Analysis for UAV-to-UAV Communication in Dynamic Networks for Smart Cities

Ubong Ukommi, Sunday Ekpo, Mfonobong Uko, Unwana Ubong Iwok, Stephen Alabi
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are integral to the development of smart city infrastructures, enabling essential services such as real-time surveillance, urban traffic regulation, and cooperative environmental monitoring. UAV-to-UAV communication networks, despite their adaptability, have significant limits stemming from onboard battery constraints, inclement weather, and variable flight trajectories. This work presents a thorough examination of energy and spectral efficiency in UAV-to-UAV communication over four frequency bands: 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz, 28 GHz, and 60 GHz. Our MATLAB R2023a simulations include classical free-space path loss, Rayleigh/Rician fading, and real-time mobility profiles, accommodating varied heights (up to 500 m), flight velocities (reaching 15 m/s), and fluctuations in the path loss exponent. Low-frequency bands (e.g., 2.4 GHz) exhibit up to 50% reduced path loss compared to higher mmWave bands for distances exceeding several hundred meters. Energy efficiency (ηe) is evaluated by contrasting throughput with total power consumption, indicating that 2.4 GHz initiates at around 0.15 bits/Joule (decreasing to 0.02 bits/Joule after 10 s), whereas 28 GHz and 60 GHz demonstrate markedly worse ηe (as low as 10−3–10−4bits/Joule), resulting from increased path loss and oxygen absorption. Similarly, sub-6 GHz spectral efficiency can attain 4×10−12bps/Hz in near-line-of-sight scenarios, whereas 60 GHz lines encounter significant attenuation at distances above 200–300 m without sophisticated beamforming techniques. Polynomial-fitting methods indicate that the projected ηe diverges from actual performance by less than 5% after 10 s of flight, highlighting the feasibility of machine-learning-based techniques for real-time power regulation, beam steering, or multi-band switching. While mmWave UAV communication can provide significant capacity enhancements (100–500 MHz bandwidth), energy efficiency deteriorates markedly without meticulous flight planning or adaptive protocols. We thus advocate using multi-band radios, adaptive modulation, and trajectory optimisation to equilibrate power consumption, ensure connection stability, and meet high data-rate requirements in densely populated, dynamic urban settings.

Smart CitiesVol. 8(2)
Manchester Metropolitan University (GB), Akwa Ibom State University (NG), University of Uyo (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
UAV Applications and Optimization
29.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.