Occurrence, Removal, and Risk Assessment of Antimicrobials and Their Transformation Products in Effluent from Australian Wastewater Treatment Plants

Despite Australia's high antimicrobial use, their residues in wastewater and their impacts on receiving waters remain largely unknown. This study assessed the occurrence, removal, and risk for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of 102 antimicrobial substances and selected transformation products (TPs) in wastewater effluent from 47 wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) across Australia. Thirty-two antimicrobials and 13 TPs were detected, with 14 analytes occurring at >80% frequencies. Ampicillin, penicillin V, penicilloic V acid, fluconazole, and tazobactam M1 were observed with high median concentrations of >0.2 μg/L. Collectively, the WWTPs released 5.4 kg/day or 0.54 g/day/1000 inhabitants of antimicrobials/TPs into natural waters, with β-lactams, quinolones, nitroimidazoles/azoles, and sulfonamides comprising high volumes, which was correlated with the population's socioeconomic statuses. Thirty-seven analytes were removed at rates >80% post-treatment, whereas quinolones, nitroimidazoles/azoles, lincosamides, and macrolide TPs were observed with poor removal efficiencies, which were affected by treatment processes and regional climate. Comparing measured concentrations with the predicted no-effect concentrations for AMR selection (PNEC<sub>AMR</sub>), 7 antimicrobials exerted selection risk for resistant bacteria. Concerningly, ciprofloxacin posed medium/high risk in most of the assessed WWTPs. The accumulative effects of antimicrobial classes and certain TPs might further aggravate adverse impacts on AMR development. Our study provides insights into the presence and AMR implications of antimicrobials in treated wastewater, aiming to safeguard public health and ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c00425
Citations
19
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Occurrence, Removal, and Risk Assessment of Antimicrobials and Their Transformation Products in Effluent from Australian Wastewater Treatment Plants

Kevin Victor Thomas, Chang He, Benjamin J. Tscharke, Katja M. Shimko et al.
19 citations
Environmental Science & Technology
Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
9.57
article

Occurrence, Removal, and Risk Assessment of Antimicrobials and Their Transformation Products in Effluent from Australian Wastewater Treatment Plants

Kevin Victor Thomas, Chang He, Benjamin J. Tscharke, Katja M. Shimko, Jake William O'Brien, Rory Verhagen, Jochen F. Mueller, Tobias Hulleman, Jinglong Li, Xueting Shao, Naixiang Zhai
article en
19 citations

Abstract

Despite Australia's high antimicrobial use, their residues in wastewater and their impacts on receiving waters remain largely unknown. This study assessed the occurrence, removal, and risk for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of 102 antimicrobial substances and selected transformation products (TPs) in wastewater effluent from 47 wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) across Australia. Thirty-two antimicrobials and 13 TPs were detected, with 14 analytes occurring at >80% frequencies. Ampicillin, penicillin V, penicilloic V acid, fluconazole, and tazobactam M1 were observed with high median concentrations of >0.2 μg/L. Collectively, the WWTPs released 5.4 kg/day or 0.54 g/day/1000 inhabitants of antimicrobials/TPs into natural waters, with β-lactams, quinolones, nitroimidazoles/azoles, and sulfonamides comprising high volumes, which was correlated with the population's socioeconomic statuses. Thirty-seven analytes were removed at rates >80% post-treatment, whereas quinolones, nitroimidazoles/azoles, lincosamides, and macrolide TPs were observed with poor removal efficiencies, which were affected by treatment processes and regional climate. Comparing measured concentrations with the predicted no-effect concentrations for AMR selection (PNEC<sub>AMR</sub>), 7 antimicrobials exerted selection risk for resistant bacteria. Concerningly, ciprofloxacin posed medium/high risk in most of the assessed WWTPs. The accumulative effects of antimicrobial classes and certain TPs might further aggravate adverse impacts on AMR development. Our study provides insights into the presence and AMR implications of antimicrobials in treated wastewater, aiming to safeguard public health and ecosystems.

Environmental Science & TechnologyVol. 59(13)
Guangdong University of Technology (CN), The University of Queensland (AU), Institute for Molecular Science (JP), Dalian Maritime University (CN), University of Amsterdam (NL)
University of Queensland, Australian Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
9.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.