Damn dirty ads: the impact of explicit and implicit profanity in advertisements

Though profanity is inherently taboo, it seems to be appearing in more advertisements, but does it help or hurt sales? In three studies, participants were shown mock-up advertisements with varying degrees and instances of profane and non-profane intensifiers and varying spokespeople. Across all studies, only implicit, low-intensity profanity was found to be more persuasive than the non-profane control; additional intensifiers decreased persuasiveness in each condition except the control. Furthermore, spokesperson dress did not influence persuasiveness, but a significant interaction between spokesperson sex and explicitness of the profanity was found. Sense of humor did not impact perceived persuasiveness of ads in Study 2 but was found to increase perceived persuasiveness in Study 3. Findings and implications are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Influence
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2025.2478934
Primary Topic
Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Damn dirty ads: the impact of explicit and implicit profanity in advertisements

Paul Wiele, John E. Edlund, Jeremy L. Marshall, Cameron Gibson
Social Influence
Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism
article

Damn dirty ads: the impact of explicit and implicit profanity in advertisements

Paul Wiele, John E. Edlund, Jeremy L. Marshall, Cameron Gibson
article en

Abstract

Though profanity is inherently taboo, it seems to be appearing in more advertisements, but does it help or hurt sales? In three studies, participants were shown mock-up advertisements with varying degrees and instances of profane and non-profane intensifiers and varying spokespeople. Across all studies, only implicit, low-intensity profanity was found to be more persuasive than the non-profane control; additional intensifiers decreased persuasiveness in each condition except the control. Furthermore, spokesperson dress did not influence persuasiveness, but a significant interaction between spokesperson sex and explicitness of the profanity was found. Sense of humor did not impact perceived persuasiveness of ads in Study 2 but was found to increase perceived persuasiveness in Study 3. Findings and implications are discussed.

Social InfluenceVol. 20(1)
Northern Illinois University (US), Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.