Comparative Performance Study of Intelligent Edge Devices

Edge computing offers a promising solution to the latency issues inherent in centralized cloud processing, particularly for industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) applications. However, the limited computational capabilities of edge devices pose challenges to optimal artificial intelligence (AI) workload performance. This study provides a comparative performance analysis of several edge devices, focusing on evaluating the impact of hardware accelerators like graphics processing units (GPUs) on AI application processing. We employ YOLOv8, a popular object detection model, to evaluate five tasks―image classification, object detection, pose estimation, instance segmentation, and oriented bounding box detection―by measuring job completion time (JCT), GPU utilization, and memory usage. Our findings indicate that expensive high-end devices do not always provide a proportionate performance boost, with mid-range devices frequently offering comparable inference performance for less computationally demanding tasks. These results underscore the need for a careful balance between hardware specifications and application requirements to achieve efficient and cost-effective AI deployment. Additionally, we observe that multi-threading does not consistently yield performance improvements on edge devices due to Python’ s Global Interpreter Lock (GIL) overhead. This limitation highlights the need for innovative solutions, such as simultaneous task management and GPU scheduling, to improve parallelism and optimize resource utilization in edge environments.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7840/kics.2025.50.3.460
Primary Topic
Infrared Target Detection Methodologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Performance Study of Intelligent Edge Devices

Kyungwoon Lee
The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences
Infrared Target Detection Methodologies
article

Comparative Performance Study of Intelligent Edge Devices

Kyungwoon Lee
article en

Abstract

Edge computing offers a promising solution to the latency issues inherent in centralized cloud processing, particularly for industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) applications. However, the limited computational capabilities of edge devices pose challenges to optimal artificial intelligence (AI) workload performance. This study provides a comparative performance analysis of several edge devices, focusing on evaluating the impact of hardware accelerators like graphics processing units (GPUs) on AI application processing. We employ YOLOv8, a popular object detection model, to evaluate five tasks―image classification, object detection, pose estimation, instance segmentation, and oriented bounding box detection―by measuring job completion time (JCT), GPU utilization, and memory usage. Our findings indicate that expensive high-end devices do not always provide a proportionate performance boost, with mid-range devices frequently offering comparable inference performance for less computationally demanding tasks. These results underscore the need for a careful balance between hardware specifications and application requirements to achieve efficient and cost-effective AI deployment. Additionally, we observe that multi-threading does not consistently yield performance improvements on edge devices due to Python’ s Global Interpreter Lock (GIL) overhead. This limitation highlights the need for innovative solutions, such as simultaneous task management and GPU scheduling, to improve parallelism and optimize resource utilization in edge environments.

The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information SciencesVol. 50(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Infrared Target Detection Methodologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.