Toward a ‘shared administration’ approach: Do local governments walk the talk?

This article highlights important issues for practitioners in Italy’s transition toward a ‘shared administration’ approach under the ‘Third Sector Code’. Drawing on the analysis of 26 ‘calls for interest’ for third sector organizations to co-design welfare services—funded through the Italy’s National Recovery and Resilience Plan—it reveals how many civil servants blend traditional purchaser–provider practices with new collaborative principles, reflecting a clash of institutional logics. These insights have important implications for public decision-makers, policy advisors and public officials who are implementing shared administration. Navigating institutional complexity can foster innovation and adaptability in public administration, yet a cultural shift is required toward more flexible, responsive governance structures. Emphasising capacity-building initiatives, cross-sector training and leadership development, the article offers practical measures to prevent tokenistic adoption of collaborative tools. Taken together, these findings equip decision-makers with strategies to move beyond hybridized practice, ultimately realizing the transformative potential of shared administration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Money & Management
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2025.2479114
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward a ‘shared administration’ approach: Do local governments walk the talk?

Walter Castelnovo, Maddalena Sorrentino, Nicola Basile
2 citations
Public Money & Management
Public Policy and Administration Research
7.31
article

Toward a ‘shared administration’ approach: Do local governments walk the talk?

Walter Castelnovo, Maddalena Sorrentino, Nicola Basile
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article highlights important issues for practitioners in Italy’s transition toward a ‘shared administration’ approach under the ‘Third Sector Code’. Drawing on the analysis of 26 ‘calls for interest’ for third sector organizations to co-design welfare services—funded through the Italy’s National Recovery and Resilience Plan—it reveals how many civil servants blend traditional purchaser–provider practices with new collaborative principles, reflecting a clash of institutional logics. These insights have important implications for public decision-makers, policy advisors and public officials who are implementing shared administration. Navigating institutional complexity can foster innovation and adaptability in public administration, yet a cultural shift is required toward more flexible, responsive governance structures. Emphasising capacity-building initiatives, cross-sector training and leadership development, the article offers practical measures to prevent tokenistic adoption of collaborative tools. Taken together, these findings equip decision-makers with strategies to move beyond hybridized practice, ultimately realizing the transformative potential of shared administration.

Public Money & ManagementVol. 46(1)
University of Insubria (IT), University of Milan (IT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Public Policy and Administration Research
7.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Toward a ‘shared administration’ approach: Do local governments walk the talk? — Walter Castelnovo, Maddalena Sorrentino, et al. · Public Money & Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS