11 topics among 7,591 employability research abstracts (1942–2024): a structural topic model and call for interdisciplinary perspectives

Purpose Our goal was to empirically evaluate what topics can be discerned in employability scholarship. We sought to illustrate the diverse specialised expert knowledge across the full multidisciplinary breadth of employability literature, not only in the two predominant fields of graduate employability and career development. Design/methodology/approach Structural topic modelling, an unsupervised statistical method that helps discern latent topics in a corpus of texts, analysed the abstracts of 7,591 journal articles on employability. Exploratory analysis showed that the 11-topic model offered the highest number of distinct and meaningful topics. Findings The 11 topics within the field of employability reflect research in a range of scholarly disciplines. We summarise the content of each topic and visualise the topic profiles of top journal articles, journals and authors. Research limitations/implications Recent calls for greater integration between graduate employability and career development scholarships are warranted. But this study demonstrates that employability is studied in a much broader range of disciplines than just those two. Therefore, we argue that future scholarship should foster the advancement and application of research insights across the full breadth of disciplines, education and training systems and socio-cultural contexts. By doing so, the often-noted fragmentation and fuzziness in the employability literature will begin to be addressed. Originality/value Existing reviews of employability research have been grounded in a particular scholarly discipline. In contrast, we adopt an inductive approach, surveying the literature through the widest possible lens, free from disciplinary biases and assumptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Career Development International
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/cdi-09-2024-0383
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Higher Education and Employability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
26.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

11 topics among 7,591 employability research abstracts (1942–2024): a structural topic model and call for interdisciplinary perspectives

Michael G. Healy, Peter McIlveen, William E. Donald, Béatrice van der Heijden et al.
3 citations
Career Development International
Higher Education and Employability
26.78
article

11 topics among 7,591 employability research abstracts (1942–2024): a structural topic model and call for interdisciplinary perspectives

Michael G. Healy, Peter McIlveen, William E. Donald, Béatrice van der Heijden, Jason Brown
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Purpose Our goal was to empirically evaluate what topics can be discerned in employability scholarship. We sought to illustrate the diverse specialised expert knowledge across the full multidisciplinary breadth of employability literature, not only in the two predominant fields of graduate employability and career development. Design/methodology/approach Structural topic modelling, an unsupervised statistical method that helps discern latent topics in a corpus of texts, analysed the abstracts of 7,591 journal articles on employability. Exploratory analysis showed that the 11-topic model offered the highest number of distinct and meaningful topics. Findings The 11 topics within the field of employability reflect research in a range of scholarly disciplines. We summarise the content of each topic and visualise the topic profiles of top journal articles, journals and authors. Research limitations/implications Recent calls for greater integration between graduate employability and career development scholarships are warranted. But this study demonstrates that employability is studied in a much broader range of disciplines than just those two. Therefore, we argue that future scholarship should foster the advancement and application of research insights across the full breadth of disciplines, education and training systems and socio-cultural contexts. By doing so, the often-noted fragmentation and fuzziness in the employability literature will begin to be addressed. Originality/value Existing reviews of employability research have been grounded in a particular scholarly discipline. In contrast, we adopt an inductive approach, surveying the literature through the widest possible lens, free from disciplinary biases and assumptions.

Career Development InternationalVol. 30(2)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of Southern Queensland (AU), Kingston University London (GB), Ghent University (BE), Wuhan Business University (CN), Services Australia (AU), University of Southampton (GB), Donaldson (United States) (US), Hubei University (CN), Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Higher Education and Employability
26.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.