“Natural Creationism”: Cognitive Foundations of Directed Evolutionary Processes

This article discusses the role of cognitive and teleonomic factors in evolution. The active role of living organisms in adaptation to the environment and transformation of their own environments is maintained. The work is based on research in the field of minimal cognition, which shows the presence of cognitive activities in organisms that do not have a nervous system (for example, bacteria and plants). Based on these data, the concept of “embodied cognition” is proposed as the basic form of cognitive activity in living systems. It is assumed that embodied cognition is carried out not in the form of mental representations, but in the form of practical (transformative) activities aimed at (1) the physiological restructuring of the body, (2) the creation of communities of organisms, or (3) the transformation of the environment to the needs of living systems (creation of ecological and cognitive developmental niches). This article emphasizes the need for elaboration of a special scientific and terminological apparatus for the description of minimal cognition. The article argues for certain goal-directedness and “intelligence” (“proto-intelligence”) of evolutionary development in nature and criticizes the neo-Darwinian reduction of the driving (“innovative”) forces of evolution exclusively to random gene mutation. It is shown that genetic inheritance is not the only channel of accumulation and transmission of hereditary information. The epigenetic and sociocultural mechanisms of heredity also take part in cumulative and directed development as well as in the transmission of acquired (phenotypic) traits. It is noted that at the system (environmental and social) level, such transfer is carried out through the creation of “developmental niches” and through the mechanisms of directed learning that exists not only in society, but also in nature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s1019331625600350
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Natural Creationism”: Cognitive Foundations of Directed Evolutionary Processes

Anton Sukhoverkhov, Irina A. Kobyakova
Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
article

“Natural Creationism”: Cognitive Foundations of Directed Evolutionary Processes

Anton Sukhoverkhov, Irina A. Kobyakova
article en

Abstract

This article discusses the role of cognitive and teleonomic factors in evolution. The active role of living organisms in adaptation to the environment and transformation of their own environments is maintained. The work is based on research in the field of minimal cognition, which shows the presence of cognitive activities in organisms that do not have a nervous system (for example, bacteria and plants). Based on these data, the concept of “embodied cognition” is proposed as the basic form of cognitive activity in living systems. It is assumed that embodied cognition is carried out not in the form of mental representations, but in the form of practical (transformative) activities aimed at (1) the physiological restructuring of the body, (2) the creation of communities of organisms, or (3) the transformation of the environment to the needs of living systems (creation of ecological and cognitive developmental niches). This article emphasizes the need for elaboration of a special scientific and terminological apparatus for the description of minimal cognition. The article argues for certain goal-directedness and “intelligence” (“proto-intelligence”) of evolutionary development in nature and criticizes the neo-Darwinian reduction of the driving (“innovative”) forces of evolution exclusively to random gene mutation. It is shown that genetic inheritance is not the only channel of accumulation and transmission of hereditary information. The epigenetic and sociocultural mechanisms of heredity also take part in cumulative and directed development as well as in the transmission of acquired (phenotypic) traits. It is noted that at the system (environmental and social) level, such transfer is carried out through the creation of “developmental niches” and through the mechanisms of directed learning that exists not only in society, but also in nature.

Herald of the Russian Academy of SciencesVol. 94(6)
Kuban State Agrarian University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“Natural Creationism”: Cognitive Foundations of Directed Evolutionary Processes — Anton Sukhoverkhov, Irina A. Kobyakova · Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS