The Evolution of Chinese Policy for Development of the High-Tech Sector: From New Technologies to New Actors?

China faces growing geopolitical and socio-economic challenges and rising technology intensity of the Chinese economy is seen as a rational response to it. The PRC is focusing on priority areas: microelectronics, emerging digital technologies, electric vehicles, etc. These measures increasingly correlate with other policies: supporting GDP growth (rise of output, employment, exports and domestic demand for high-tech); reducing critical vulnerabilities of the national high-tech sector from imports and sanctions; laying the basis for accelerated growth. However, this has only limited potential for the innovative transformation of the Chinese economy. New approaches to the technological development are needed, also including relations between the state and the business sector. Chinese technology policy traditionally relies on large companies, “national champions.” But due to the limited efficiency of both state-owned enterprises and private companies, fast-growing tech-intensive small and medium enterprises in recent years have appeared in the focus of government support. Initially, they were used for import substitution and development of critical industrial technologies. But now these “little giants” are seen by the PRC as a mean to balance the national innovation system (including new sources of “creative destruction”). However, this, as well as other policies and instruments, also has an ad-hoc nature. The PRC needs to systematize its policy and stress connections between different measures and actors. The role of the state is also questionable, since it has become more interventionist. Further formation of the NIS institutions is required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s1019331625600155
Primary Topic
Economic Growth and Productivity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Evolution of Chinese Policy for Development of the High-Tech Sector: From New Technologies to New Actors?

И. В. Данилин
Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Economic Growth and Productivity
article

The Evolution of Chinese Policy for Development of the High-Tech Sector: From New Technologies to New Actors?

И. В. Данилин
article en

Abstract

China faces growing geopolitical and socio-economic challenges and rising technology intensity of the Chinese economy is seen as a rational response to it. The PRC is focusing on priority areas: microelectronics, emerging digital technologies, electric vehicles, etc. These measures increasingly correlate with other policies: supporting GDP growth (rise of output, employment, exports and domestic demand for high-tech); reducing critical vulnerabilities of the national high-tech sector from imports and sanctions; laying the basis for accelerated growth. However, this has only limited potential for the innovative transformation of the Chinese economy. New approaches to the technological development are needed, also including relations between the state and the business sector. Chinese technology policy traditionally relies on large companies, “national champions.” But due to the limited efficiency of both state-owned enterprises and private companies, fast-growing tech-intensive small and medium enterprises in recent years have appeared in the focus of government support. Initially, they were used for import substitution and development of critical industrial technologies. But now these “little giants” are seen by the PRC as a mean to balance the national innovation system (including new sources of “creative destruction”). However, this, as well as other policies and instruments, also has an ad-hoc nature. The PRC needs to systematize its policy and stress connections between different measures and actors. The role of the state is also questionable, since it has become more interventionist. Further formation of the NIS institutions is required.

Herald of the Russian Academy of SciencesVol. 94(5)
Institute of World Economy and International Relations (RU)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Economic Growth and Productivity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.