Inferring the morphology of the Galactic Center excess with Gaussian processes

Descriptions of the Galactic Center using Fermi gamma-ray data have so far modeled the Galactic Center excess (GCE) as a template with fixed spatial morphology or as a linear combination of such templates. Although these templates are informed by various physical expectations, the morphology of the excess is a priori unknown. For the first time, we describe the GCE using a flexible, nonparametric machine learning model---the Gaussian process (GP). We assess our model's performance on synthetic data, demonstrating that the model can recover the templates used to generate the data. We then fit the Fermi data with our model in a single energy bin from 2--20 GeV (leaving a spectral GP analysis of the GCE for future work) using a variety of template models of diffuse gamma-ray emission to quantify our fits' systematic uncertainties associated with diffuse emission modeling. We interpret our best-fit GP in terms of GCE templates consisting of an Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) squared template and a bulge component to determine which bulge models can best describe the fitted GP and to what extent the best-fit GP is described better by an NFW squared template versus a bulge template. The best-fit GP contains morphological features that are typically not associated with traditional GCE studies. These include a localized bright source at around $(\ensuremath{\ell},b)=(20\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{},0\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{})$ and a diagonal arm extending Northwest from the Galactic Center. In spite of these novel features, the fitted GP is explained best by a template-based model consisting of the bulge presented in Coleman et al. (2020) and a squared NFW component. Our results suggest that the physical interpretation of the GCE in terms of stellar bulge and NFW-like components is highly sensitive to the assumed morphologies, background models, and the region of the sky used for inference.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.111.063065
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inferring the morphology of the Galactic Center excess with Gaussian processes

Matthew R. Buckley, Edward Ramirez, Tracy R. Slatyer, Yitian Sun et al.
2 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
2.31
article

Inferring the morphology of the Galactic Center excess with Gaussian processes

Matthew R. Buckley, Edward Ramirez, Tracy R. Slatyer, Yitian Sun, Siddharth Mishra-Sharma
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Descriptions of the Galactic Center using Fermi gamma-ray data have so far modeled the Galactic Center excess (GCE) as a template with fixed spatial morphology or as a linear combination of such templates. Although these templates are informed by various physical expectations, the morphology of the excess is a priori unknown. For the first time, we describe the GCE using a flexible, nonparametric machine learning model---the Gaussian process (GP). We assess our model's performance on synthetic data, demonstrating that the model can recover the templates used to generate the data. We then fit the Fermi data with our model in a single energy bin from 2--20 GeV (leaving a spectral GP analysis of the GCE for future work) using a variety of template models of diffuse gamma-ray emission to quantify our fits' systematic uncertainties associated with diffuse emission modeling. We interpret our best-fit GP in terms of GCE templates consisting of an Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) squared template and a bulge component to determine which bulge models can best describe the fitted GP and to what extent the best-fit GP is described better by an NFW squared template versus a bulge template. The best-fit GP contains morphological features that are typically not associated with traditional GCE studies. These include a localized bright source at around $(\ensuremath{\ell},b)=(20\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{},0\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{})$ and a diagonal arm extending Northwest from the Galactic Center. In spite of these novel features, the fitted GP is explained best by a template-based model consisting of the bulge presented in Coleman et al. (2020) and a squared NFW component. Our results suggest that the physical interpretation of the GCE in terms of stellar bulge and NFW-like components is highly sensitive to the assumed morphologies, background models, and the region of the sky used for inference.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 111(6)
Harvard University Press (US), Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (NL), The NSF AI Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Fundamental Interactions (US), McGill University (CA), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, Simons Foundation, Aspen Center for Physics, Office of Science, Mainz Institute for Theoretical Physics, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, High Energy Physics
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.