On the Different Plural Endings of Nouns with the Suffixes -(н)иk and -(н)ица in the Bulgarian Literary Language during the National Revival

The article examines the problem of identifying the dictionary form and grammatical gender of nouns with the suffixes -(н)ик and -(н)ица occurring only in the plural in Bulgarian Revival texts. This difficulty arises from several factors: 1) in the 19th century, many dialectal words, as well as specialised terms form various spheres of public life entered the Bulgarian literary language; 2) no comprehensive dictionaries documenting the lexical richness of the language existed; 3) the plural endings of nouns with the suffixes -(н)ик and -(н)ица historically converged (-ници and -ици). Given these circum-stances, researchers can rely on the written distinctions between the nominative and accusative forms of masculine plural nouns, as well as the graphical differentiation between the nominative plural endings of masculine and feminine nouns. Lexicographic works published after the Liberation also played an important role. Further, the article explores how 19th-century grammar books, published in the second and third quarters of the century, addressed the issue of differentiating plural noun endings. Several examples from the 1871 Bible, provided in the study, illustrate how the problem of determining the dictionary form of plural nouns with the suffixes -(н)ик and -(н)ица was resolved in practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Bulgarian Language
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47810/bl.72.25.pr.21
Primary Topic
Literature, Language, and Rhetoric Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Different Plural Endings of Nouns with the Suffixes -(н)иk and -(н)ица in the Bulgarian Literary Language during the National Revival

Lachezar Perchekliyski
Journal of Bulgarian Language
Literature, Language, and Rhetoric Studies
article

On the Different Plural Endings of Nouns with the Suffixes -(н)иk and -(н)ица in the Bulgarian Literary Language during the National Revival

Lachezar Perchekliyski
article en

Abstract

The article examines the problem of identifying the dictionary form and grammatical gender of nouns with the suffixes -(н)ик and -(н)ица occurring only in the plural in Bulgarian Revival texts. This difficulty arises from several factors: 1) in the 19th century, many dialectal words, as well as specialised terms form various spheres of public life entered the Bulgarian literary language; 2) no comprehensive dictionaries documenting the lexical richness of the language existed; 3) the plural endings of nouns with the suffixes -(н)ик and -(н)ица historically converged (-ници and -ици). Given these circum-stances, researchers can rely on the written distinctions between the nominative and accusative forms of masculine plural nouns, as well as the graphical differentiation between the nominative plural endings of masculine and feminine nouns. Lexicographic works published after the Liberation also played an important role. Further, the article explores how 19th-century grammar books, published in the second and third quarters of the century, addressed the issue of differentiating plural noun endings. Several examples from the 1871 Bible, provided in the study, illustrate how the problem of determining the dictionary form of plural nouns with the suffixes -(н)ик and -(н)ица was resolved in practice.

Journal of Bulgarian LanguageVol. 72(PRIL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Literature, Language, and Rhetoric Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.