Reconsidering the Funerary Amulets from Multiple Perspectives: The <i>Swrt</i> -Bead and the <i>Ḏrtt</i> -Bead in the Middle Kingdom

In the Middle Kingdom, the swrt -bead was often painted on mummy masks and anthropoid coffins. This study examines the carnelian barrel bead amulet in the Middle Kingdom from iconographic and archaeological perspectives. Several forms of the carnelian barrel bead amulet exist, but few studies have focused on the reasons behind these variations. Furthermore, the archaeological context of this type of amulet has been overlooked. Therefore, I clarify that the amulet form changed depending on the date, place, and occasionally, social status of the deceased. Secondly, I consider the ḏrtt -bead by investigating object friezes and archaeological evidence. The results suggest that the cases in which a single carnelian bead was found on the hand of the deceased instead of the neck are not examples of ignoring the funerary literature, but were instead likely placed there as a ḏrtt -bead. This finding emphasizes the importance of the archaeological context when naming objects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03075133251327437
Primary Topic
Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconsidering the Funerary Amulets from Multiple Perspectives: The Swrt -Bead and the Ḏrtt -Bead in the Middle Kingdom

Seria Yamazaki
The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology
Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
article

Reconsidering the Funerary Amulets from Multiple Perspectives: The Swrt -Bead and the Ḏrtt -Bead in the Middle Kingdom

Seria Yamazaki
article en

Abstract

In the Middle Kingdom, the swrt -bead was often painted on mummy masks and anthropoid coffins. This study examines the carnelian barrel bead amulet in the Middle Kingdom from iconographic and archaeological perspectives. Several forms of the carnelian barrel bead amulet exist, but few studies have focused on the reasons behind these variations. Furthermore, the archaeological context of this type of amulet has been overlooked. Therefore, I clarify that the amulet form changed depending on the date, place, and occasionally, social status of the deceased. Secondly, I consider the ḏrtt -bead by investigating object friezes and archaeological evidence. The results suggest that the cases in which a single carnelian bead was found on the hand of the deceased instead of the neck are not examples of ignoring the funerary literature, but were instead likely placed there as a ḏrtt -bead. This finding emphasizes the importance of the archaeological context when naming objects.

The Journal of Egyptian ArchaeologyVol. 111(1-2)
Waseda University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reconsidering the Funerary Amulets from Multiple Perspectives: The <i>Swrt</i> -Bead and the <i>Ḏrtt</i> -Bead in the Middle Kingdom — Seria Yamazaki · The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS