Benchmarking metagenomic binning tools on real datasets across sequencing platforms and binning modes

Metagenomic binning is a culture-free approach that facilitates the recovery of metagenome-assembled genomes by grouping genomic fragments. However, there remains a lack of a comprehensive benchmark to evaluate the performance of metagenomic binning tools across various combinations of data types and binning modes. In this study, we benchmark 13 metagenomic binning tools using short-read, long-read, and hybrid data under co-assembly, single-sample, and multi-sample binning, respectively. The benchmark results demonstrate that multi-sample binning exhibits optimal performance across short-read, long-read, and hybrid data. Moreover, multi-sample binning outperforms other binning modes in identifying potential antibiotic resistance gene hosts and near-complete strains containing potential biosynthetic gene clusters across diverse data types. This study also recommends three efficient binners across all data-binning combinations, as well as high-performance binners for each combination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-57957-6
Citations
16
Primary Topic
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking metagenomic binning tools on real datasets across sequencing platforms and binning modes

Ziye Wang, Shanfeng Zhu, Haitao Han
16 citations
Nature Communications
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
12.90
article

Benchmarking metagenomic binning tools on real datasets across sequencing platforms and binning modes

Ziye Wang, Shanfeng Zhu, Haitao Han
article en
16 citations

Abstract

Metagenomic binning is a culture-free approach that facilitates the recovery of metagenome-assembled genomes by grouping genomic fragments. However, there remains a lack of a comprehensive benchmark to evaluate the performance of metagenomic binning tools across various combinations of data types and binning modes. In this study, we benchmark 13 metagenomic binning tools using short-read, long-read, and hybrid data under co-assembly, single-sample, and multi-sample binning, respectively. The benchmark results demonstrate that multi-sample binning exhibits optimal performance across short-read, long-read, and hybrid data. Moreover, multi-sample binning outperforms other binning modes in identifying potential antibiotic resistance gene hosts and near-complete strains containing potential biosynthetic gene clusters across diverse data types. This study also recommends three efficient binners across all data-binning combinations, as well as high-performance binners for each combination.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 16(1)
Nankai University (CN), Fudan University (CN), Shanghai Institute for Science of Science (CN), Shanghai Center for Brain Science and Brain-Inspired Technology (CN), Laboratoire de physique de la matière condensée (FR)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
12.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Benchmarking metagenomic binning tools on real datasets across sequencing platforms and binning modes — Ziye Wang, Shanfeng Zhu, et al. · Nature Communications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS